Schull Michael J, Morrison Laurie J, Vermeulen Marian, Redelmeier Donald A
Department of Emergency Services, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Jul;10(7):709-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00064.x.
To determine the effect of simultaneous ambulance diversion at multiple emergency departments (EDs) (gridlock) on transport delays for patients with chest pain.
Retrospective data on consecutive ambulance patients with chest pain and the diversion status of EDs in Toronto were obtained from January 1998 to December 1999. Gridlock was calculated separately for the four city quadrants as the daily duration of episodes where all EDs in the quadrant were simultaneously diverting ambulances. The primary outcome was 90th percentile ambulance transport interval (scene departure to hospital arrival).
Eleven thousand four hundred patients were included (mean age 67 years; female 51%; severity of illness: moderate to life-threatening 89%). Gridlock occurred an average of 1.1 hour/day, and 3,060 patients were transported on days when it occurred. Ninetieth percentile transport interval was 15.5 minutes (95% CI = 15.3 to 15.9) for patients not exposed to gridlock vs. 17.4 minutes (95% CI = 16.8 to 17.8) for patients who were exposed to gridlock. In multivariate analyses, gridlock was associated with both transport and total out-of-hospital interval delays (0.2 min/hour, 95% CI = 0.1 to 0.4 and 0.2 min/hour, 95% CI = 0.04 to 0.4, respectively). Delays were similar regardless of patient severity of illness (p = 0.5). Age (0.8 min/10 years, 95% CI = 0.5 to 1), female gender (1.9 min, 95% CI = 1.3 to 2.6), advanced care paramedics (5.3 min, 95% CI = 4.4 to 6.3), and snowfall (0.8 min/cm, 95% CI = 0.2 to 1.5) were also independently associated with delays.
Ambulance diversion was associated with delays in out-of-hospital ambulance transport for chest pain patients, but only when it resulted in gridlock. The magnitude of the out-of-hospital delay was the same regardless of the patient's severity of illness.
确定多个急诊科同时实施救护车分流(拥堵)对胸痛患者转运延迟的影响。
获取1998年1月至1999年12月期间多伦多连续胸痛救护车患者的回顾性数据以及急诊科的分流状态。分别计算四个城市象限的拥堵情况,即该象限所有急诊科同时分流救护车的每日时长。主要结局指标是第90百分位数的救护车转运间隔时间(现场出发至医院到达)。
纳入11400例患者(平均年龄67岁;女性占51%;疾病严重程度:中度至危及生命的占89%)。拥堵平均每天发生1.1小时,在发生拥堵的日子里有3060例患者被转运。未经历拥堵的患者第90百分位数转运间隔时间为15.5分钟(95%置信区间=15.3至15.9),而经历拥堵的患者为17.4分钟(95%置信区间=16.至17.8)。在多变量分析中,拥堵与转运延迟和总的院外间隔时间延迟均相关(分别为0.2分钟/小时,95%置信区间=0.1至0.4和0.2分钟/小时,95%置信区间=0.04至0.4)。无论患者疾病严重程度如何,延迟情况相似(p=0.5)。年龄(0.8分钟/10岁,95%置信区间=0.5至1)、女性(1.9分钟,95%置信区间=1.3至2.6)、高级护理急救人员(5.3分钟,95%置信区间=4.4至6.3)以及降雪量(0.8分钟/厘米,95%置信区间=0.2至1.5)也均与延迟独立相关。
救护车分流与胸痛患者的院外救护车转运延迟相关,但仅在导致拥堵时如此。无论患者疾病严重程度如何,院外延迟的程度相同。