• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

服务于大量少数族裔人群的加利福尼亚医院比其他医院更有可能采用救护车分流。

California hospitals serving large minority populations were more likely than others to employ ambulance diversion.

机构信息

emergency medicine at University of California, San Francisco, and emergency medicine at San Francisco General Hospital, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Aug;31(8):1767-76. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1020.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1020
PMID:22869655
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3618957/
Abstract

It is well documented that racial and ethnic minority populations disproportionately use hospital emergency departments for safety-net care. But what is not known is whether emergency department crowding is disproportionately affecting minority populations and potentially aggravating existing health care disparities, including poorer outcomes for minorities. We examined ambulance diversion, a proxy measure for crowding, at 202 California hospitals. We found that hospitals serving large minority populations were more likely to divert ambulances than were hospitals with a lower proportion of minorities, even when controlling for hospital ownership, emergency department capacity, and other hospital demographic and structural factors. These findings suggest that establishing more-uniform criteria to regulate diversion may help reduce disparities in access to emergency care.

摘要

有大量文献记载表明,少数族裔人群不成比例地使用医院急诊部门来获得保障性医疗服务。但目前还不清楚急诊部门的拥堵是否不成比例地影响到少数族裔人群,以及是否可能加剧现有的医疗保健差距,包括少数族裔的治疗效果更差。我们调查了 202 家加利福尼亚医院的救护车分流情况,这是衡量拥堵的一个替代指标。我们发现,服务于大量少数族裔人群的医院比少数民族比例较低的医院更有可能分流救护车,即使在控制医院所有权、急诊部门容量和其他医院人口统计和结构因素后也是如此。这些发现表明,制定更加统一的标准来规范分流可能有助于减少急诊护理获取方面的差距。

相似文献

1
California hospitals serving large minority populations were more likely than others to employ ambulance diversion.服务于大量少数族裔人群的加利福尼亚医院比其他医院更有可能采用救护车分流。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Aug;31(8):1767-76. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1020.
2
Do patients hospitalised in high-minority hospitals experience more diversion and poorer outcomes? A retrospective multivariate analysis of Medicare patients in California.在少数族裔比例高的医院住院的患者是否会经历更多的转诊,并且预后更差?对加利福尼亚州医疗保险患者的一项回顾性多变量分析。
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 17;6(3):e010263. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010263.
3
Characteristics of hospitals diverting ambulances in a California EMS system.加州 EMS 系统中转运救护车的医院特征。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014 Feb;29(1):27-31. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X13009242. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
4
Is Inpatient Volume Or Emergency Department Crowding A Greater Driver Of Ambulance Diversion?住院患者人数或急诊部门拥挤是否是导致救护车分流的更大因素?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jul;37(7):1115-1122. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1602.
5
Variations in crowding and ambulance diversion in nine emergency departments.九个急诊科拥挤和救护车转院情况的变化。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Sep;18(9):941-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01149.x.
6
The effect of an ambulance diversion ban on emergency department length of stay and ambulance turnaround time.救护车转院禁令对急诊科停留时间和救护车周转时间的影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Mar;61(3):303-311.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.09.009. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
7
No place to unload: a preliminary analysis of the prevalence, risk factors, and consequences of ambulance diversion.无处卸载:对救护车分流的患病率、危险因素及后果的初步分析
Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Jan;23(1):43-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70006-0.
8
Utilization and impact of ambulance diversion at the community level.社区层面救护车分流的使用情况及影响。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2002 Apr-Jun;6(2):191-8. doi: 10.1080/10903120290938535.
9
Relieving overcrowded emergency departments through ambulance diversion.通过救护车分流缓解急诊科拥挤状况。
Hosp Top. 1990 Summer;68(3):23-7. doi: 10.1080/00185868.1990.10543675.
10
Collaborative to decrease ambulance diversion: the California Emergency Department Diversion Project.合作减少救护车转运:加利福尼亚急诊科转运项目
J Emerg Med. 2011 Mar;40(3):300-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2010.02.023. Epub 2010 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Ambulance diversion and its use as an ED overcrowding mitigation strategy: Does it work? A scoping review.救护车分流及其作为缓解急诊科拥挤的策略:它有效吗?一项范围综述。
Int J Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 8;18(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12245-025-00933-0.
2
Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in California Ambulance Patient Offload Times.加利福尼亚州救护车患者卸载时间的种族和社会经济差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2510325. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.10325.
3
Race and Ethnicity Disparities in Management and Outcomes of Critically Ill Adults with Acute Respiratory Failure.危重症急性呼吸衰竭成人的管理和结局中的种族和民族差异。
Crit Care Clin. 2024 Oct;40(4):671-683. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2024.05.004. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
4
Racial and ethnic disparities in emergency department transfers to public hospitals.急诊部向公立医院的转院存在种族和民族差异。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr;59(2):e14276. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14276. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
5
A Conceptual Framework for Optimizing the Equity of Hospital-Based Emergency Care: The Structure of Hospital Transfer Networks.优化基于医院的紧急护理公平性的概念框架:医院转院网络的结构。
Milbank Q. 2023 Mar;101(1):74-125. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12609. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
6
Ambulance diversion and ED destination by race/ethnicity: evaluation of Massachusetts' ambulance diversion ban.救护车转院和按种族/族裔划分的急诊目的地:对马萨诸塞州救护车转院禁令的评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 3;22(1):987. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08358-8.
7
Emergency department condition acuity, length of stay, and revisits among deaf and hard-of-hearing patients: A retrospective chart review.聋人和重听患者在急诊科的病情严重程度、住院时间和复诊情况:一项回顾性图表审查。
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Nov;29(11):1290-1300. doi: 10.1111/acem.14573. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
8
Conceptual Model of Emergency Department Utilization among Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Patients: A Critical Review.聋人和重听患者急诊科利用概念模型:批判性评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 7;18(24):12901. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182412901.
9
Centralized Ambulance Destination Determination: A Retrospective Data Analysis to Determine Impact on EMS System Distribution, Surge Events, and Diversion Status.集中救护车目的地决策:一项回顾性数据分析,旨在确定其对 EMS 系统分布、高峰事件和转院状态的影响。
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct 26;22(6):1311-1316. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.8.53198.
10
Treatment in Disproportionately Minority Hospitals Is Associated With Increased Risk of Mortality in Sepsis: A National Analysis.在少数民族比例过高的医院接受治疗与脓毒症患者的死亡率升高相关:一项全国性分析。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Jul;48(7):962-967. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004375.

本文引用的文献

1
Ending ambulance diversion in massachusetts.结束马萨诸塞州的救护车分流。
Virtual Mentor. 2010 Jun 1;12(6):483-6. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2010.12.6.pfor2-1006.
2
Variations in crowding and ambulance diversion in nine emergency departments.九个急诊科拥挤和救护车转院情况的变化。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Sep;18(9):941-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01149.x.
3
Association between ambulance diversion and survival among patients with acute myocardial infarction.救护车转院与急性心肌梗死患者生存之间的关联。
JAMA. 2011 Jun 15;305(23):2440-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.811. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
4
Factors associated with closures of emergency departments in the United States.与美国急诊科关闭相关的因素。
JAMA. 2011 May 18;305(19):1978-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.620.
5
Hospital determinants of emergency department left without being seen rates.急诊未就诊率的医院决定因素。
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;58(1):24-32.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.01.009. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
6
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2007 emergency department summary.国家医院门诊医疗护理调查:2007年急诊科总结
Natl Health Stat Report. 2010 Aug 6(26):1-31.
7
Trends and characteristics of US emergency department visits, 1997-2007.1997 - 2007年美国急诊科就诊的趋势与特征
JAMA. 2010 Aug 11;304(6):664-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1112.
8
The effect of emergency department crowding on length of stay and medication treatment times in discharged patients with acute asthma.急诊拥挤对急性哮喘出院患者的住院时间和药物治疗时间的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Aug;17(8):834-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00780.x.
9
Collaborative to decrease ambulance diversion: the California Emergency Department Diversion Project.合作减少救护车转运:加利福尼亚急诊科转运项目
J Emerg Med. 2011 Mar;40(3):300-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2010.02.023. Epub 2010 Apr 10.
10
Understanding the risk factors of trauma center closures: do financial pressure and community characteristics matter?了解创伤中心关闭的风险因素:财务压力和社区特征重要吗?
Med Care. 2009 Sep;47(9):968-78. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819c9415.