Zealear David L, Billante Cheryl R, Courey Mark S, Netterville James L, Paniello Randal C, Sanders Ira, Herzon Garrett D, Goding George S, Mann Wolf, Ejnell Hasse, Habets Alfons M M C, Testerman Roy, Van de Heyning Paul
Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical School, Medical Center North S2100, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Laryngoscope. 2003 Jul;113(7):1149-56. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200307000-00010.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Electrical stimulation of the posterior cricoarytenoid muscle, when paced with inspiration, offers a physiological approach to restore ventilation in bilateral laryngeal paralysis without any of the disadvantages associated with conventional treatment.
A prospective study of six patients.
The patients were successfully implanted with an Itrel II stimulator (Medtronic, Inc). In postoperative sessions, stimulated vocal fold abduction, patient ventilation, and voice were assessed and compared with preoperative values.
The optimum stimulus paradigm was a 1- to 2-second train of 1-millisecond pulses delivered at a frequency of 30 to 40 Hz and amplitude of 2 to 7 V. Posterior cricoarytenoid stimulation produced a large dynamic abduction (3.5-7 mm) in three patients and moderate abduction (3 mm) in a fourth patient. The fifth patient showed a large but delayed response of 4 mm to stimulation with some lateralization of the vocal fold. In the sixth patient, stimulated abduction was noted on device implantation but was lost postoperatively. All five patients with stimulated abduction postoperatively met the ventilatory criteria for decannulation, and three patients subsequently had decannulation. Long-term stimulation of the posterior cricoarytenoid muscle had no appreciable effect on voice quality.
Electrical stimulation of the posterior cricoarytenoid muscle shows potential as an improved therapy for bilateral vocal fold paralysis.
目的/假设:在吸气时对环杓后肌进行电刺激,为恢复双侧喉麻痹患者的通气功能提供了一种生理性方法,且没有传统治疗方法的任何缺点。
对6例患者进行的前瞻性研究。
患者成功植入Itrel II刺激器(美敦力公司)。在术后阶段,评估刺激后的声带外展、患者通气功能和嗓音,并与术前值进行比较。
最佳刺激模式是一串1至2秒、频率为30至40赫兹、幅度为2至7伏、脉宽1毫秒的脉冲。环杓后肌刺激使3例患者产生了较大的动态外展(3.5至7毫米),第4例患者产生了中等程度的外展(3毫米)。第5例患者对刺激有4毫米的较大但延迟的反应,声带略有偏斜。在第6例患者中,在植入装置时观察到刺激后的外展,但术后消失。术后所有5例有刺激后外展的患者均达到了拔管的通气标准,3例患者随后进行了拔管。长期刺激环杓后肌对嗓音质量没有明显影响。
环杓后肌电刺激显示出作为双侧声带麻痹改良治疗方法的潜力。