Reese Nancy B, Bandy William D
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR, USA.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003 Jun;33(6):326-30. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2003.33.6.326.
Test-retest design to evaluate the reliability of the measurement of iliotibial (IT) band flexibility using an inclinometer to measure the hip adduction angle.
The primary objective was to determine the intrarater reliability of the Ober test and the modified Ober test for the assessment of IT band flexibility using an inclinometer to measure the hip adduction angle. A secondary objective was to determine if a difference existed between the measurements of IT band flexibility between the Ober and modified Ober test.
The Ober test and the modified Ober test are frequently used for the measurement of IT band flexibility. To date, data documenting the objective measurement of flexibility of the IT band is scarce in the literature.
Sixty-one subjects, with a mean age of 24.2 (SD = 4.3) years, were measured during 2 measurement sessions over 2 consecutive days. During each measurement session, subjects were positioned on their left side and, with an inclinometer at the lateral epicondyle of the femur, hip adduction was measured during the Ober test (knee at 90 degrees of flexion) and the modified Ober test (knee extended). If the limb was horizontal, it was considered to be at 0 degrees, if below horizontal (adducted), it was recorded as a positive number, and if above horizontal (abducted), it was recorded as a negative number.
The ICC values calculated for the intrarater reliability of the repeated measurement were 0.90 for the Ober test and 0.91 for the modified Ober test. Results of the dependent t test indicated a significantly greater range of motion of the hip in adduction using the modified Ober test as compared to the Ober test.
The use of an inclinometer to measure hip adduction using both the Ober test and the modified Ober test appears to be a reliable method for the measurement of IT band flexibility, and the technique is quite easy to use. However, given that the modified Ober test allows significantly greater hip adduction range of motion than the Ober test, the 2 examination procedures should not be used interchangeably for the measurement of the flexibility of the IT band.
采用重测设计,通过倾角仪测量髋关节内收角度来评估髂胫束(IT)带柔韧性测量的可靠性。
主要目的是确定使用倾角仪测量髋关节内收角度时,奥伯试验(Ober test)和改良奥伯试验评估IT带柔韧性的同一评估者内部可靠性。次要目的是确定奥伯试验和改良奥伯试验在IT带柔韧性测量结果上是否存在差异。
奥伯试验和改良奥伯试验常用于测量IT带柔韧性。迄今为止,文献中记录IT带柔韧性客观测量数据的资料很少。
61名受试者,平均年龄24.2(标准差 = 4.3)岁,在连续两天的2次测量期间进行测量。在每次测量期间,受试者左侧卧位,在股骨外侧髁处放置倾角仪,在奥伯试验(膝关节屈曲90度)和改良奥伯试验(膝关节伸直)过程中测量髋关节内收情况。如果肢体水平,则视为0度;如果低于水平(内收),记录为正数;如果高于水平(外展),记录为负数。
重复测量的同一评估者内部可靠性计算得出的组内相关系数(ICC)值,奥伯试验为0.90,改良奥伯试验为0.91。配对t检验结果表明,与奥伯试验相比,改良奥伯试验中髋关节内收的活动范围明显更大。
使用倾角仪通过奥伯试验和改良奥伯试验测量髋关节内收似乎是一种可靠的测量IT带柔韧性的方法,且该技术易于使用。然而,鉴于改良奥伯试验比奥伯试验允许更大的髋关节内收活动范围,这两种检查程序在测量IT带柔韧性时不应互换使用。