Suppr超能文献

性犯罪者再犯风险:我们所知与我们需知之事。

Sexual offender recidivism risk: what we know and what we need to know.

作者信息

Hanson R Karl, Morton Kelly E, Harris Andrew J R

机构信息

Corrections Research, Department of the Solicitor General of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0P8, Canada.

出版信息

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Jun;989:154-66; discussion 236-46.

Abstract

If all sexual offenders are dangerous, why bother assessing their risk to reoffend? Follow-up studies, however, typically find sexual recidivism rates of 10%-15% after five years, 20% after 10 years, and 30%-40% after 20 years. The observed rates underestimate the actual rates because not all offences are detected; however, the available research does not support the popular notion that sexual offenders inevitably reoffend. Some sexual offenders are more dangerous than others. Much is known about the static, historical factors associated with increased recidivism risk (e.g., prior offences, age, and relationship to victims). Less is known about the offender characteristics that need to change in order to reduce that risk. There has been considerable research in recent years demonstrating that structured risk assessments are more accurate than unstructured clinical assessments. Nevertheless, the limitations of actuarial risk assessments are sufficient that experts have yet to reach consensus on the best methods for combining risk factors into an overall evaluation.

摘要

如果所有性犯罪者都具有危险性,那么为何还要费心评估他们再次犯罪的风险呢?然而,后续研究通常发现,五年后的性犯罪再犯率为10% - 15%,十年后为20%,二十年后为30% - 40%。观察到的这些比率低估了实际比率,因为并非所有罪行都被发现;然而,现有研究并不支持性犯罪者必然会再次犯罪这一普遍观念。一些性犯罪者比其他性犯罪者更危险。我们对与再犯风险增加相关的静态历史因素(例如,前科、年龄以及与受害者的关系)了解很多。对于为降低该风险而需要改变的犯罪者特征,我们了解较少。近年来有大量研究表明,结构化风险评估比非结构化临床评估更准确。尽管如此,精算风险评估的局限性足够大,以至于专家们尚未就将风险因素整合到整体评估中的最佳方法达成共识。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验