Hayashi Koichi, Ozawa Yuri, Fujiwara Keiji, Wakino Shu, Kumagai Hiroo, Saruta Takao
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Am J Nephrol. 2003 Jul-Aug;23(4):229-44. doi: 10.1159/000072054. Epub 2003 Jul 1.
Although calcium antagonists are used as a first-line antihypertensive agent, controversy attends the renal microvascular effects of calcium antagonists. Since calcium antagonists elicit predominant vasodilation of the afferent arteriole, they might ostensibly aggravate glomerular hypertension. Recently, novel types of calcium antagonists have been developed, some of which are reported to dilate efferent as well as afferent arterioles. The present review attempted to characterize the renal microvascular action of calcium antagonists, and evaluated the consequences of renal injury following the treatment with these antagonists. In contrast to predominant afferent arteriolar action of conventional calcium antagonists (e.g. nifedipine, nicardipine, amlodipine and diltiazem), novel antagonists (e.g. manidipine, nilvadipine, benidipine and efonidipine) potently dilated both afferent and efferent arterioles. The vasodilator action on efferent arterioles appears to be mediated in part by the blockade of T-type calcium channels, particularly through the inhibition of the intracellular calcium release mechanism. The comparison of the anti-proteinuric action of calcium antagonists in subtotally nephrectomized rats showed that efonidipine and enalapril, both possessing vasodilator action on efferent arterioles, exerted more prominent action than other calcium antagonists. Finally, in patients with chronic renal disease, a 48-week treatment with efonidipine reduced proteinuria, and this effect was seen even when the mean arterial blood pressure failed to reach below 100 mm Hg. In conclusion, although calcium antagonists potently inhibit afferent arteriolar constriction, efferent arteriolar responses to these agents vary, depending on the types of calcium antagonists used. These divergent actions of these agents on the efferent arteriole may alter differently the glomerular hemodynamics, and could affect the final outcome of underlying renal diseases.
尽管钙拮抗剂被用作一线抗高血压药物,但钙拮抗剂对肾脏微血管的影响仍存在争议。由于钙拮抗剂主要引起入球小动脉的血管舒张,它们表面上可能会加重肾小球高血压。最近,新型钙拮抗剂已被开发出来,其中一些据报道可使入球小动脉和出球小动脉均扩张。本综述试图描述钙拮抗剂的肾脏微血管作用,并评估使用这些拮抗剂治疗后肾脏损伤的后果。与传统钙拮抗剂(如硝苯地平、尼卡地平、氨氯地平和地尔硫䓬)主要作用于入球小动脉不同,新型拮抗剂(如马尼地平、尼伐地平、贝尼地平和依福地平)能有效扩张入球小动脉和出球小动脉。对出球小动脉的血管舒张作用似乎部分是由T型钙通道的阻断介导的,特别是通过抑制细胞内钙释放机制。比较钙拮抗剂在次全肾切除大鼠中的抗蛋白尿作用表明,依福地平和依那普利都对出球小动脉有血管舒张作用,它们比其他钙拮抗剂发挥更显著的作用。最后,在慢性肾病患者中,依福地平治疗48周可降低蛋白尿,即使平均动脉血压未降至100 mmHg以下,这种效果也能观察到。总之,尽管钙拮抗剂能有效抑制入球小动脉收缩,但这些药物对出球小动脉的反应因所用钙拮抗剂的类型而异。这些药物对出球小动脉的不同作用可能会不同地改变肾小球血流动力学,并可能影响潜在肾脏疾病的最终结局。