Suppr超能文献

研究机构如何更有效地将研究知识传递给决策者?

How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers?

作者信息

Lavis John N, Robertson Dave, Woodside Jennifer M, McLeod Christopher B, Abelson Julia

机构信息

McMaster University.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 2003;81(2):221-48, 171-2. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00052.

Abstract

Five questions--What should be transferred to decision makers? To whom should it be transferred? By whom? How? With what effect?--provide an organizing framework for a knowledge transfer strategy. Opportunities for improving how research organizations transfer research knowledge can be found in the differences between the answers suggested by our understanding of the research literature and those provided by research-organization directors asked to describe what they do. In Canada, these opportunities include developing actionable messages for decision makers (only 30 percent of research organizations frequently or always do this), developing knowledge-uptake skills in target audiences and knowledge-transfer skills in research organizations (only 20 to 22 percent frequently or always do this), and evaluating the impact of knowledge-transfer activities (only 8 to 12 percent frequently or always conduct an evaluation). Research funders can help research organizations take advantage of these opportunities.

摘要

五个问题——应该向决策者传递什么?应该传递给谁?由谁来传递?如何传递?会产生什么效果?——为知识转移策略提供了一个组织框架。在我们对研究文献的理解所建议的答案与被要求描述其做法的研究组织负责人所提供的答案之间的差异中,可以找到改善研究组织如何转移研究知识的机会。在加拿大,这些机会包括为决策者制定可操作的信息(只有30%的研究组织经常或总是这样做),在目标受众中培养知识吸收技能以及在研究组织中培养知识转移技能(只有20%至22%的研究组织经常或总是这样做),以及评估知识转移活动的影响(只有8%至12%的研究组织经常或总是进行评估)。研究资助者可以帮助研究组织利用这些机会。

相似文献

1
How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers?
Milbank Q. 2003;81(2):221-48, 171-2. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00052.
3
A knowledge transfer strategy for public health decision makers.
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004;1(2):120-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2004.t01-1-04009.x.
5
Living longer, living better: preview of CIHR Institute of Aging 2013-2018 strategic plan.
Can J Aging. 2013 Jun;32(2):209-13. doi: 10.1017/S0714980813000226. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
7
A meeting of minds: interdisciplinary research in the health sciences in Canada.
CMAJ. 2006 Sep 26;175(7):763-71. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060783.
8
Pathways to the use of health services research in policy.
Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1111-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00958.x. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
10
Finding audiences, changing beliefs: the structure of research use in Canadian health policy.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1990 Fall;15(3):525-42. doi: 10.1215/03616878-15-3-525.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the potential for scaling evidence-based interventions in African health systems: A deliberate dialogue.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Jul 14;23(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01369-x.
5
Knowledge transfer interventions on cancer in Africa and Asia: a scoping review.
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 16;25(1):704. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14061-8.
6
Framework to guide the use of mathematical modelling in evidence-based policy decision-making.
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 5;15(4):e093645. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093645.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring the impact of health research.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003 Jul;8(3):165-70. doi: 10.1258/135581903322029520.
2
Do Canadian civil servants care about the health of populations?
Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):658-63. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.4.658.
3
Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002 Oct;7(4):239-44. doi: 10.1258/135581902320432778.
5
Examining the role of health services research in public policymaking.
Milbank Q. 2002;80(1):125-54. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00005.
6
Power of information: closing the gap between research and policy.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Mar-Apr;21(2):264-73. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.264.
7
Ideas at the margin or marginalized ideas? Nonmedical determinants of health in Canada.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Mar-Apr;21(2):107-12. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.107.
9
Evidence-based management: from theory to practice in health care.
Milbank Q. 2001;79(3):429-57, IV-V. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00214.
10
Evidence based policy: proceed with care.
BMJ. 2001 Aug 4;323(7307):275-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7307.275.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验