Suppr超能文献

将卫生服务研究应用于政策的途径。

Pathways to the use of health services research in policy.

作者信息

Gold Marsha

机构信息

Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., Washington, DC 20024, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1111-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00958.x. Epub 2009 Mar 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To apply social science theory so as to define more explicitly the pathways that influence policy makers' use of health services research.

METHODS

The analysis builds on a literature review and the author's observations. It identifies important social science concepts relevant to use of research in policy and organizational decision making. It integrates and expands upon existing frameworks to differentiate and analyze 10 pathways that can lead to the use of health services research by policy makers.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The process through which research is applied involves many factors, only some of which are amenable to influence by researchers. Within these constraints, multiple pathways can drive research use; no one of these is likely to perform better in all circumstances. Successful uptake is more likely when these pathways cause findings to be converted into messages meaningful to policy makers. Various intermediaries play an important role in creating effective pathways, while users also can influence them.

CONCLUSIONS

The pathways open up what too often is an unexplored "black box" that mediates between health services research and its use by policy makers. Such pathways can help stakeholders to bridge different perspectives in ways that strengthen the possibility that effective research will be supported and used.

摘要

目的

应用社会科学理论,以便更明确地界定影响政策制定者使用卫生服务研究的途径。

方法

该分析基于文献综述和作者的观察。它确定了与政策和组织决策中研究使用相关的重要社会科学概念。它整合并扩展了现有框架,以区分和分析可导致政策制定者使用卫生服务研究的10条途径。

主要发现

研究应用过程涉及许多因素,其中只有一些因素可受研究人员影响。在这些限制条件下,多种途径可推动研究的使用;在所有情况下,没有一种途径可能表现得更好。当这些途径使研究结果转化为对政策制定者有意义的信息时,成功采用的可能性更大。各种中介机构在创建有效途径方面发挥着重要作用,而使用者也可以对其产生影响。

结论

这些途径打开了一个常常未被探索的“黑匣子”,它在卫生服务研究及其被政策制定者使用之间起到中介作用。此类途径可帮助利益相关者以加强有效研究将得到支持和使用可能性的方式弥合不同观点。

相似文献

1
Pathways to the use of health services research in policy.
Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1111-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00958.x. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
2
Commentary: understanding the underlying politics of health care policy decision making.
Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1137-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00979.x. Epub 2009 May 26.
3
Health policy roundtable--view from the state legislature: translating research into policy.
Health Serv Res. 2005 Apr;40(2):337-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00359.x.
5
Partnership experiences: involving decision-makers in the research process.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003 Oct;8 Suppl 2:26-34. doi: 10.1258/135581903322405144.
7
How are policy makers using evidence? Models of research utilisation and local NHS policy making.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Jun;54(6):461-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.6.461.
8
Use of social science data for policy analysis and policy-making.
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1981 Fall;59(4):596-603.
9
Implementing findings of research.
BMJ. 1994 Jun 4;308(6942):1488-92. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6942.1488.

引用本文的文献

1
What is context in knowledge translation? Results of a systematic scoping review.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Apr 29;22(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01143-5.
3
Health Policy and Systems Research Capacities in Ethiopia and Ghana: Findings From a Self-Assessment.
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022 Sep 15;10(Suppl 1). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00715.
4
Open science at the science-policy interface: bringing in the evidence?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jun 20;20(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00867-6.
5
Designing and Implementing a Curriculum to Support Health Equity Research Leaders: The Interdisciplinary Research Leaders Experience.
Front Public Health. 2022 May 13;10:876847. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.876847. eCollection 2022.
6
Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review.
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Jan 19;9(1):211032. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211032. eCollection 2022 Jan.
8
Use of research evidence in state health policymaking: Menu labeling policy in California.
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Oct 21;16:101004. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.101004. eCollection 2019 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature.
Milbank Q. 2007 Dec;85(4):729-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00506.x.
2
3
U.S. policy on health inequities: the interplay of politics and research.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2006 Feb;31(1):93-126. doi: 10.1215/03616878-31-1-93.
4
Translating research to action: improving physician access in public insurance.
J Ambul Care Manage. 2006 Jan-Mar;29(1):36-50. doi: 10.1097/00004479-200601000-00005.
5
When health policy is the problem: a report from the field.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2005 Jun;30(3):327-65; discussion 367-73. doi: 10.1215/03616878-30-3-327.
6
Research use in children's mental health policy in Canada: maintaining vigilance amid ambiguity.
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Oct;61(8):1649-57. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.03.032. Epub 2005 Apr 26.
7
Consulting as a strategy for knowledge transfer.
Milbank Q. 2005;83(2):299-321. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00348.x.
8
Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations.
Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581-629. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x.
9
Lost in translation? Reflections on the role of research in improving health care for children.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Sep-Oct;23(5):125-30. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.5.125.
10
Evidence for public health policy on inequalities: 2: assembling the evidence jigsaw.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Oct;58(10):817-21. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.015297.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验