Gold Marsha
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., Washington, DC 20024, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1111-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00958.x. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
To apply social science theory so as to define more explicitly the pathways that influence policy makers' use of health services research.
The analysis builds on a literature review and the author's observations. It identifies important social science concepts relevant to use of research in policy and organizational decision making. It integrates and expands upon existing frameworks to differentiate and analyze 10 pathways that can lead to the use of health services research by policy makers.
The process through which research is applied involves many factors, only some of which are amenable to influence by researchers. Within these constraints, multiple pathways can drive research use; no one of these is likely to perform better in all circumstances. Successful uptake is more likely when these pathways cause findings to be converted into messages meaningful to policy makers. Various intermediaries play an important role in creating effective pathways, while users also can influence them.
The pathways open up what too often is an unexplored "black box" that mediates between health services research and its use by policy makers. Such pathways can help stakeholders to bridge different perspectives in ways that strengthen the possibility that effective research will be supported and used.
应用社会科学理论,以便更明确地界定影响政策制定者使用卫生服务研究的途径。
该分析基于文献综述和作者的观察。它确定了与政策和组织决策中研究使用相关的重要社会科学概念。它整合并扩展了现有框架,以区分和分析可导致政策制定者使用卫生服务研究的10条途径。
研究应用过程涉及许多因素,其中只有一些因素可受研究人员影响。在这些限制条件下,多种途径可推动研究的使用;在所有情况下,没有一种途径可能表现得更好。当这些途径使研究结果转化为对政策制定者有意义的信息时,成功采用的可能性更大。各种中介机构在创建有效途径方面发挥着重要作用,而使用者也可以对其产生影响。
这些途径打开了一个常常未被探索的“黑匣子”,它在卫生服务研究及其被政策制定者使用之间起到中介作用。此类途径可帮助利益相关者以加强有效研究将得到支持和使用可能性的方式弥合不同观点。