• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Pathways to the use of health services research in policy.将卫生服务研究应用于政策的途径。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1111-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00958.x. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
2
Commentary: understanding the underlying politics of health care policy decision making.评论:理解医疗保健政策决策背后的政治因素。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1137-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00979.x. Epub 2009 May 26.
3
Health policy roundtable--view from the state legislature: translating research into policy.健康政策圆桌会议——来自州立法机构的观点:将研究转化为政策
Health Serv Res. 2005 Apr;40(2):337-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00359.x.
4
Mutual Distrust: Perspectives From Researchers and Policy Makers on the Research to Policy Gap in 2013 and Recommendations for the Future.相互不信任:研究人员和政策制定者对2013年研究与政策差距的看法及未来建议
Inquiry. 2017 Jan 1;54:46958017705465. doi: 10.1177/0046958017705465.
5
Partnership experiences: involving decision-makers in the research process.合作经验:让决策者参与研究过程。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003 Oct;8 Suppl 2:26-34. doi: 10.1258/135581903322405144.
6
Making Research Matter Comment on "Public Spending on Health Service and Policy Research in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States: A Modest Proposal".让研究发挥作用——评“加拿大、英国和美国的卫生服务和政策研究公共支出:一个适度的建议”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Apr 1;7(4):353-355. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.97.
7
How are policy makers using evidence? Models of research utilisation and local NHS policy making.政策制定者如何运用证据?研究利用模型与当地国民保健服务体系的政策制定
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Jun;54(6):461-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.6.461.
8
Use of social science data for policy analysis and policy-making.利用社会科学数据进行政策分析和决策。
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1981 Fall;59(4):596-603.
9
Implementing findings of research.实施研究结果。
BMJ. 1994 Jun 4;308(6942):1488-92. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6942.1488.
10
How is the use of research evidence in health policy perceived? A comparison between the reporting of researchers and policy-makers.研究证据在卫生政策中的应用是如何被感知的?研究人员和政策制定者报告的比较。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 20;16(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0345-6.

引用本文的文献

1
What is context in knowledge translation? Results of a systematic scoping review.知识转化中的语境是什么?系统范围综述的结果。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Apr 29;22(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01143-5.
2
Using evidence in mental health policy agenda-setting in low- and middle-income countries: a conceptual meta-framework from a scoping umbrella review.利用证据制定中低收入国家精神卫生政策议程:来自范围综述的概念元框架。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Aug 2;38(7):876-893. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad038.
3
Health Policy and Systems Research Capacities in Ethiopia and Ghana: Findings From a Self-Assessment.埃塞俄比亚和加纳的卫生政策和体系研究能力:一项自我评估的结果。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022 Sep 15;10(Suppl 1). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00715.
4
Open science at the science-policy interface: bringing in the evidence?科学政策接口的开放科学:引入证据?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jun 20;20(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00867-6.
5
Designing and Implementing a Curriculum to Support Health Equity Research Leaders: The Interdisciplinary Research Leaders Experience.设计和实施支持健康公平研究领导者的课程:跨学科研究领导者的经验。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 13;10:876847. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.876847. eCollection 2022.
6
Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review.开放科学中的累积优势动态与公平性威胁:一项范围综述
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Jan 19;9(1):211032. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211032. eCollection 2022 Jan.
7
An embedded implementation research initiative to tackle service delivery bottlenecks in the expanded programme on immunisation in Pakistan: Overview and reflections.在巴基斯坦扩大免疫规划中解决服务提供瓶颈问题的嵌入式实施研究倡议:概述与反思。
J Glob Health. 2021 May 8;11:06003. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.06003.
8
Use of research evidence in state health policymaking: Menu labeling policy in California.研究证据在州卫生政策制定中的应用:加利福尼亚州的菜单标签政策
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Oct 21;16:101004. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.101004. eCollection 2019 Dec.
9
A systematic review of frameworks for the interrelationships of mental health evidence and policy in low- and middle-income countries.系统评价框架对中低收入国家心理健康证据与政策的相互关系。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Aug 22;16(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0357-2.
10
Using an Integrated Knowledge Translation (IKT) Approach to Enable Policy Change for Electronic Consultations in Canada.采用综合知识转化(IKT)方法推动加拿大电子咨询的政策变革。
Healthc Policy. 2018 Aug;14(1):19-29. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2018.25551.

本文引用的文献

1
Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature.知识转移与交流:文献综述与综合
Milbank Q. 2007 Dec;85(4):729-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00506.x.
2
Health policy roundtable: producing and adapting research syntheses for use by health-system managers and public policymakers.卫生政策圆桌会议:生成并调整研究综述以供卫生系统管理者和公共政策制定者使用。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Jun;41(3 Pt 1):905-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00576.x.
3
U.S. policy on health inequities: the interplay of politics and research.美国关于健康不平等的政策:政治与研究的相互作用。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2006 Feb;31(1):93-126. doi: 10.1215/03616878-31-1-93.
4
Translating research to action: improving physician access in public insurance.
J Ambul Care Manage. 2006 Jan-Mar;29(1):36-50. doi: 10.1097/00004479-200601000-00005.
5
When health policy is the problem: a report from the field.当健康政策成为问题时:来自实地的一份报告。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2005 Jun;30(3):327-65; discussion 367-73. doi: 10.1215/03616878-30-3-327.
6
Research use in children's mental health policy in Canada: maintaining vigilance amid ambiguity.加拿大儿童心理健康政策中的研究应用:在模糊性中保持警惕。
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Oct;61(8):1649-57. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.03.032. Epub 2005 Apr 26.
7
Consulting as a strategy for knowledge transfer.作为知识转移策略的咨询服务。
Milbank Q. 2005;83(2):299-321. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00348.x.
8
Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations.服务组织中的创新扩散:系统综述与建议
Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581-629. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x.
9
Lost in translation? Reflections on the role of research in improving health care for children.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Sep-Oct;23(5):125-30. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.5.125.
10
Evidence for public health policy on inequalities: 2: assembling the evidence jigsaw.关于不平等问题的公共卫生政策证据:2:拼凑证据拼图。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Oct;58(10):817-21. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.015297.

将卫生服务研究应用于政策的途径。

Pathways to the use of health services research in policy.

作者信息

Gold Marsha

机构信息

Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., Washington, DC 20024, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1111-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00958.x. Epub 2009 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00958.x
PMID:19490163
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2739019/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To apply social science theory so as to define more explicitly the pathways that influence policy makers' use of health services research.

METHODS

The analysis builds on a literature review and the author's observations. It identifies important social science concepts relevant to use of research in policy and organizational decision making. It integrates and expands upon existing frameworks to differentiate and analyze 10 pathways that can lead to the use of health services research by policy makers.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The process through which research is applied involves many factors, only some of which are amenable to influence by researchers. Within these constraints, multiple pathways can drive research use; no one of these is likely to perform better in all circumstances. Successful uptake is more likely when these pathways cause findings to be converted into messages meaningful to policy makers. Various intermediaries play an important role in creating effective pathways, while users also can influence them.

CONCLUSIONS

The pathways open up what too often is an unexplored "black box" that mediates between health services research and its use by policy makers. Such pathways can help stakeholders to bridge different perspectives in ways that strengthen the possibility that effective research will be supported and used.

摘要

目的

应用社会科学理论,以便更明确地界定影响政策制定者使用卫生服务研究的途径。

方法

该分析基于文献综述和作者的观察。它确定了与政策和组织决策中研究使用相关的重要社会科学概念。它整合并扩展了现有框架,以区分和分析可导致政策制定者使用卫生服务研究的10条途径。

主要发现

研究应用过程涉及许多因素,其中只有一些因素可受研究人员影响。在这些限制条件下,多种途径可推动研究的使用;在所有情况下,没有一种途径可能表现得更好。当这些途径使研究结果转化为对政策制定者有意义的信息时,成功采用的可能性更大。各种中介机构在创建有效途径方面发挥着重要作用,而使用者也可以对其产生影响。

结论

这些途径打开了一个常常未被探索的“黑匣子”,它在卫生服务研究及其被政策制定者使用之间起到中介作用。此类途径可帮助利益相关者以加强有效研究将得到支持和使用可能性的方式弥合不同观点。