Suppr超能文献

[综合老年医学评估在初级保健中的有效性]

[Effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care].

作者信息

Gil de Gómez Barragán M J, Ramalle-Gómara E

机构信息

Unidad Docente de MFyC. La Rioja. España.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2003 Jun 30;32(2):92-100. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(03)70743-4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review and update evidence on the effectiveness of the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) of the elderly in the community environment.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (January 1997 to November 2001) and The Cochrane Library, completed with a manual search.

SELECTION OF STUDIES

Randomised clinical trials (RCT) to study the effects of a CGA in people over 64 and not in an institution. Trials that assessed mortality, institutionalisation and functional status were included. Those conducted after hospital discharge or not in a community environment were excluded. 133 summaries were reviewed and 16 articles analysed.

DATA EXTRACTION

Methodological quality assessed with adapted Jadad scale. A data archive was worked out to collect information on characteristics of the population and the intervention and on the main findings.

RESULTS

The quality of the trials was adequate, though they had important methodological differences. Eleven trials found no favourable effects in the result variables studied. Five of the twelve trials which assessed functional status and one of the twelve that evaluated admissions to institutions found some favourable effect. None of the nine studies with mortality data found favourable results.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence for the effectiveness of the CGA for the elderly not in institutions continues to be inconsistent and insufficient. Nevertheless, given the complexity of this intervention, it seems prudent to continue to conduct CGAs of the elderly in the PC environment until such time as further studies clarify the role of these programmes.

摘要

目的

回顾并更新关于老年人在社区环境中进行综合老年评估(CGA)有效性的证据。

设计

系统评价。

数据来源

MEDLINE(1997年1月至2001年11月)和考克兰图书馆,并辅以手工检索。

研究选择

随机临床试验(RCT),以研究CGA对64岁以上非住院人群的影响。纳入评估死亡率、机构收容率和功能状态的试验。排除出院后进行的试验或非社区环境中的试验。共审查了133篇摘要,分析了16篇文章。

数据提取

采用改良的雅达量表评估方法学质量。建立了一个数据档案,以收集有关人群特征、干预措施以及主要研究结果的信息。

结果

试验质量尚可,但存在重要的方法学差异。11项试验在所研究的结果变量中未发现有益效果。在评估功能状态的12项试验中,有5项以及在评估机构收容情况的12项试验中,有1项发现了一些有益效果。在有死亡率数据的9项研究中,均未发现有益结果。

结论

对于非住院老年人,CGA有效性的证据仍然不一致且不充分。然而,鉴于这种干预措施的复杂性,在进一步研究阐明这些项目的作用之前,在初级保健环境中继续对老年人进行CGA似乎是谨慎之举。

相似文献

5
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验