Touzeau O, Allouch C, Borderie V, Kopito R, Laroche L
Service d'Ophtalmologie, Hôpital St Antoine, 184, rue du Faubourg St Antoine, 75012 Paris.
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2003 Apr;26(4):355-63.
To study the correlation between subjective refraction and biometry obtained by Orbscan and echography in normal eyes. To compare biometric parameters with the subjective spherical equivalent.
Subjective refraction, biometric parameters using Orbscan, and echography were recorded in 190 normal eyes (including eyes with ametropia) of 95 patients. Biometric parameters (i.e., corneal diameter, anterior chamber depth, central pachymetry, iridocorneal angle, corneal and lens radii of curvature, and axial length of the eye) were compared in different refractive groups and were correlated with the subjective refraction.
Corneal biometric parameters did not correlate with the subjective spherical equivalent and showed no differences between the refractive groups except for the central pachymetry. In the high myopic group (<-6D), the central cornea was significantly thinner (531 micro m versus 549 micro m, p=0.016). The correlation between corneal radius and axial length was strong in emmetropic eyes (r(s)=0.63, p<0.001) and poor but significant in ametropic eyes (r(s)=0.28, p=0.002). Axial length, anterior chamber depth, and iridocorneal angle showed significant differences between the refractive groups (p<0.001) and correlated with the subjective spherical equivalent (r(s[[/INF=0.44, p<0.001). Subjective spherical equivalent showed the strongest correlation with the axial length (rs)=0.82, p<0.001). Subjective spherical equivalent, central corneal thickness, axial length, anterior chamber depth, and anterior corneal radius showed a strong correlation between both eyes (rs[[/INF=0.94, p<0.001).
Biometric characteristics of the eye (excluding cornea characteristics) vary with subjective spherical equivalent. Axial length presents the strongest correlation with the subjective spherical equivalent and correlates with the other ocular biometric parameters. Axial length plays a major role in the ocular biometry and refraction.
研究正常眼主观验光与Orbscan及超声生物显微镜测量的生物测量参数之间的相关性。比较生物测量参数与主观等效球镜度。
记录了95例患者190只正常眼(包括屈光不正眼)的主观验光、使用Orbscan测量的生物测量参数以及超声生物显微镜测量结果。比较了不同屈光组的生物测量参数(即角膜直径、前房深度、中央角膜厚度、虹膜角膜角、角膜和晶状体曲率半径以及眼轴长度),并将其与主观验光结果进行相关性分析。
角膜生物测量参数与主观等效球镜度无相关性,除中央角膜厚度外,各屈光组之间无差异。在高度近视组(<-6D)中,中央角膜明显更薄(531μm对549μm,p = 0.016)。正视眼中角膜半径与眼轴长度的相关性较强(r(s)=0.63,p<0.001),而在屈光不正眼中相关性较差但有统计学意义(r(s)=0.28,p = 0.002)。眼轴长度、前房深度和虹膜角膜角在各屈光组之间存在显著差异(p<0.001),并与主观等效球镜度相关(r(s[[/INF=0.44,p<0.001)。主观等效球镜度与眼轴长度的相关性最强(rs)=0.82,p<0.001)。主观等效球镜度、中央角膜厚度、眼轴长度、前房深度和角膜前表面半径在双眼之间显示出很强的相关性(rs[[/INF=0.94,p<0.001)。
眼的生物测量特征(不包括角膜特征)随主观等效球镜度而变化。眼轴长度与主观等效球镜度的相关性最强,并与其他眼部生物测量参数相关。眼轴长度在眼部生物测量和屈光中起主要作用。