Malich Ansgar, Facius Mirjam, Anderson Roselle, Böttcher Joachim, Sauner Dieter, Hansch Andreas, Marx Christiane, Petrovitch Alexander, Pfleiderer Stefan, Kaiser Werner
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Friedrich Schiller University, Bachstrasse 18, 07740, Jena, Germany.
Eur Radiol. 2003 Nov;13(11):2441-6. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-1988-3. Epub 2003 Jul 5.
Cancer cells exhibit altered local dielectric properties which can be assessed using electrical impedance scanning (EIS). The study was aimed at clarifying influence of lesion size and depth on EIS performance. From a series of 387 lesions (129 malignant and 258 benign) from 363 patients being sonographically and/or mammographically evaluated, size and depth information was not available in 112 lesions, size was available in 86 lesions and additional depth information was available in 189 lesions, respectively, while performing EIS. Lesions were either histologically verified or had a follow-up of at least 2 years. One hundred three of 129 malignant lesions and 165 of 258 benign lesions were correctly detected (sensitivity 79.8%, specificity 64.0%, accuracy 71.9%). Sensitivity without knowledge of size and depth was 64.6% (10 of 16 malignant lesions detected). This value increased to 76.2% (32 of 42) with knowledge of the size and further increased to 85.9% with knowledge of size and depth (61 of 71). Specificity values in the three subgroups were almost similar: 64.6 (62 of 96), 65.9 (29 of 44), and 62.7% (74 of 118), respectively. Accuracy rises from 63.6% (without knowledge of size/depth) to 71.1 and 74.3% (with size knowledge and with size and depth knowledge, respectively). Accuracy of EIS improved significantly by including sonographical information about depth and size into the analysis. Ultrasound examination should be performed prior to EIS.
癌细胞表现出局部介电特性改变,可使用电阻抗扫描(EIS)进行评估。该研究旨在阐明病变大小和深度对EIS性能的影响。在对363例患者进行超声和/或乳腺X线检查评估的一系列387个病变(129个恶性病变和258个良性病变)中,在进行EIS时,分别有112个病变无法获得大小和深度信息,86个病变可获得大小信息,189个病变可获得额外的深度信息。病变均经组织学证实或至少随访2年。129个恶性病变中的103个和258个良性病变中的165个被正确检测(敏感性79.8%,特异性64.0%,准确性71.9%)。在不知道大小和深度的情况下,敏感性为64.6%(检测出16个恶性病变中的10个)。知道大小后,该值增至76.2%(42个中的32个),知道大小和深度后进一步增至85.9%(71个中的61个)。三个亚组中的特异性值几乎相似:分别为64.6%(96个中的62个)、65.9%(44个中的29个)和62.7%(118个中的74个)。准确性从63.6%(不知道大小/深度)分别提高到71.1%和74.3%(知道大小和知道大小及深度)。通过将有关深度和大小的超声信息纳入分析,EIS的准确性显著提高。应在EIS之前进行超声检查。