Sant Milena, Allemani Claudia, Capocaccia Riccardo, Hakulinen Timo, Aareleid Tiiu, Coebergh Jan Willem, Coleman Michel P, Grosclaude Pascale, Martinez Carmen, Bell Janine, Youngson Judith, Berrino Franco
Epidemiology Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, I-20133 Milan, Italy.
Int J Cancer. 2003 Sep 1;106(3):416-22. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11226.
We used multiple regression models to assess the influence of disease stage at diagnosis on the 5-year relative survival of 4,478 patients diagnosed with breast cancer in 1990-1992. The cases were representative samples from 17 population-based cancer registries in 6 European countries (Estonia, France, Italy, Netherlands, Spain and UK) that were combined into 9 regional groups based on similar survival. Five-year relative survival was 79% overall, varying from 98% for early, node-negative (T1N0M0) tumours; 87% for large, node-negative (T2-3N0M0) tumours; 76% for node-positive (T1-3N+M0) tumours and 55% for locally advanced (T4NxM0) tumours to 18% for metastatic (M1) tumours and 69% for tumours of unspecified stage. There was considerable variation across Europe in relative survival within each disease stage, but this was least marked for early node-negative tumours. Overall 5-year relative survival was highest in the French group of Bas-Rhin, Côte d'Or, Hérault and Isère (86%), and lowest in Estonia (66%). These geographic groups were characterised by the highest and lowest percentages of women with early stage disease (T1N0M0: 39% and 9%, respectively). The French, Dutch and Italian groups had the highest percentage of operated cases. The number of axillary nodes examined, a factor influencing nodal status, was highest in Italy and Spain. After adjusting for TNM stage and the number of nodes examined, survival differences were greatly reduced, indicating that for these women, diagnosed with breast cancer in Europe during 1990-1992, the survival differences were mainly due to differences in stage at diagnosis. However, in 3 regional groups, the relative risks of death remained high even after these adjustments, suggesting less than optimal treatment. Screening for breast cancer did not seem to affect the survival patterns once stage had been taken into account.
我们使用多元回归模型,评估1990 - 1992年确诊的4478例乳腺癌患者诊断时的疾病分期对其5年相对生存率的影响。这些病例是来自6个欧洲国家(爱沙尼亚、法国、意大利、荷兰、西班牙和英国)17个基于人群的癌症登记处的代表性样本,根据相似的生存率合并为9个区域组。总体5年相对生存率为79%,早期、无淋巴结转移(T1N0M0)肿瘤为98%;大的、无淋巴结转移(T2 - 3N0M0)肿瘤为87%;有淋巴结转移(T1 - 3N + M0)肿瘤为76%;局部晚期(T4NxM0)肿瘤为55%;转移性(M1)肿瘤为18%;分期不明的肿瘤为69%。在欧洲,每个疾病分期的相对生存率存在相当大的差异,但早期无淋巴结转移肿瘤的差异最小。总体5年相对生存率在法国的下莱茵省、科多尔省、埃罗省和伊泽尔省组最高(86%),在爱沙尼亚最低(66%)。这些地理组的特点是早期疾病(T1N0M0)女性的百分比最高和最低(分别为39%和9%)。法国、荷兰和意大利组的手术病例百分比最高。影响淋巴结状态的一个因素——检查的腋窝淋巴结数量,在意大利和西班牙最高。在调整TNM分期和检查的淋巴结数量后,生存差异大幅降低,这表明对于1990 - 1992年在欧洲被诊断为乳腺癌的这些女性,生存差异主要是由于诊断时分期的差异。然而,在3个区域组中,即使经过这些调整,死亡的相对风险仍然很高,这表明治疗效果欠佳。一旦考虑了分期,乳腺癌筛查似乎并未影响生存模式。