Suppr超能文献

冬季和夏季育肥猪在栏式结构和圈养环境中的生长性能。

Performance of finishing pigs in hoop structures and confinement during winter and summer.

作者信息

Honeyman M S, Harmon J D

机构信息

Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011, USA.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2003 Jul;81(7):1663-70. doi: 10.2527/2003.8171663x.

Abstract

Performance of finishing pigs in hoop structures or confinement during winter and summer was evaluated in Iowa. Hoops are large, tent-like shelters with cornstalks or straw for bedding. During summer and winter seasons for 3 yr (1998 to 2001), six trials were conducted using three hoop barns (designed for 150 pigs per pen, one pen per hoop) or a mechanically ventilated confinement barn with slatted floors (designed for 22 pigs per pen, six pens in the barn). A total of 3,518 pigs started the trials. Summer trials were June through October, and winter trials were December through April. Target stocking density was 1.11 m2/pig in hoops and 0.74 m2/pig in confinement. Identical corn-based diets were fed ad libitum from 16 to 118 kg for 127 d. Pigs were scanned before harvest for backfat and loin muscle area. When seasons were merged (season x housing interaction, P > or = 0.05), hoop-fed pigs had more backfat (21.8 +/- 0.3 vs 20.8 +/- 0.2 mm; P < 0.001), smaller loin muscle area (41.3 +/- 0.3 vs 43.0 +/- 0.2 cm2; P < 0.001), less lean percentage (51.1 +/- 0.2 vs 52.1 +/- 0.1%; P < 0.001), and less yield (74.9 vs 75.8 +/- 0.1%; P < 0.001) than confinement-fed pigs. When season x housing type interactions were observed (P < 0.004), summer hoop-fed pigs had greater ADG (834 +/- 5 vs 802 +/- 3 g/d; P < 0.001), required fewer days to 113 kg (174.9 +/- 0.9 vs 178.5 +/- 0.6 d; P < 0.01), had similar ADFI (2.40 +/- 0.03 vs 2.35 +/- 0.02 kg/d, as-fed basis) and gain:feed (G:F; 348 +/- 4 vs 342 +/- 3 g/kg) compared with confinement-fed pigs. Lean gain/day and efficiency of lean gain did not differ between housing systems. During winter, hoop-fed pigs had similar ADG (794 +/- 5 vs 801 +/- 3 g/ d), required more days to 113 kg (176.7 +/- 0.9 vs 172.9 +/- 0.6 d; P < 0.01), had greater ADFI (2.54 +/- 0.03 vs 2.35 +/- 0.02; P < 0.001), less G:F (313 +/- 4 vs 341 +/- 3; P < 0.001), less lean gain/day (312 +/- 2 vs 322 +/- 1 g/d; P < 0.01), and less efficiency of lean gain (130 +/- 2 vs 144 +/- 1 g lean gain/kg feed; P < 0.01) than confinement-fed pigs. Percentage of mortalities and culls did not differ between housing systems. During summer, there was a trend for fewer light pigs at marketing (< 100 kg) from hoops (0.8 vs 1.7%; P = 0.10). During winter, there were more light pigs at marketing from hoops (3.9 vs 1.3%; P = 0.01) than from confinement. Bedding use in hoops was 92 and 122 kg/pig for summer and winter, respectively. Performance of finishing pigs in bedded hoop structures depends in part on thermal environment.

摘要

在爱荷华州对育肥猪在冬季和夏季的圈栏结构或封闭式猪舍中的生长性能进行了评估。圈栏是大型的帐篷状畜舍,以玉米秸秆或稻草作为垫料。在1998年至2001年的3年时间里,在夏季和冬季进行了6次试验,使用了3个圈栏式猪舍(每个圈栏设计容纳150头猪,每个圈栏1栏)或一个带漏缝地板的机械通风封闭式猪舍(每个栏设计容纳22头猪,猪舍内有6栏)。共有3518头猪开始试验。夏季试验在6月至10月进行,冬季试验在12月至4月进行。圈栏式猪舍的目标饲养密度为每头猪1.11平方米,封闭式猪舍为每头猪0.74平方米。从体重16千克到118千克的127天时间里,给猪自由采食相同的玉米型日粮。在屠宰前对猪进行扫描,测量背膘厚度和腰大肌面积。当合并季节因素(季节×猪舍类型交互作用,P≥0.05)时,圈栏式猪舍饲养的猪背膘更厚(21.8±0.3毫米对20.8±0.2毫米;P<0.001),腰大肌面积更小(41.3±0.3平方厘米对43.0±0.2平方厘米;P<0.001),瘦肉率更低(51.1±0.2%对52.1±0.1%;P<0.001),胴体产率更低(74.9%对75.8±0.1%;P<0.001),与封闭式猪舍饲养的猪相比。当观察到季节×猪舍类型交互作用(P<0.004)时,夏季圈栏式猪舍饲养的猪平均日增重更高(834±5克/天对802±3克/天;P<0.001),达到113千克所需天数更少(174.9±0.9天对178.5±0.6天;P<0.01),与封闭式猪舍饲养的猪相比,平均日采食量相似(2.40±0.03千克/天对2.35±0.02千克/天,以饲喂状态计),料重比(G:F)相似(348±4克/千克对342±3克/千克)。不同猪舍系统间的瘦肉日增重和瘦肉增重效率没有差异。在冬季,圈栏式猪舍饲养的猪平均日增重相似(794±5克/天对801±3克/天),达到113千克所需天数更多(176.7±0.9天对172.9±0.6天;P<0.01),平均日采食量更大(2.54±0.03千克/天对2.35±0.0

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验