Ragland J Daniel
Department of Psychiatry, Brain Behavior Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Gates Building 10th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2003 Aug;5(4):299-302. doi: 10.1007/s11920-003-0059-4.
In this article, the author reviews basic neuropsychologic issues in the study of schizophrenia. The first issue is whether cognitive dysfunction reflects a degenerative process or is a core feature of the disorder. Evidence demonstrating that cognitive difficulties are present at illness onset and are not caused by medication, illness progression, or other nonspecific factors is reviewed. The second question is less easily answered and deals with whether cognitive difficulties represent generalized dysfunction or differential deficits in specific neurocognitive domains. One difficulty in answering this question is the heterogeneous nature of the disorder. Clinical and cognitive subtyping approaches to reducing heterogeneity are discussed, with the conclusion that cognitive approaches hold the most promise for understanding subtype differences in neurobiologic substrates. Finally, the relation of cognitive ability to functional outcome is described, and it is explained why there is a resurgent interest in remediation efforts. The article closes with suggestions for future directions.
在本文中,作者回顾了精神分裂症研究中的基本神经心理学问题。第一个问题是认知功能障碍是反映了一种退行性过程还是该疾病的核心特征。文中回顾了相关证据,这些证据表明认知困难在疾病发作时就已存在,且并非由药物、疾病进展或其他非特异性因素所致。第二个问题较难回答,涉及认知困难是代表一般性功能障碍还是特定神经认知领域的差异性缺陷。回答这个问题的一个困难在于该疾病的异质性。文中讨论了减少异质性的临床和认知亚型划分方法,得出的结论是认知方法在理解神经生物学底物中的亚型差异方面最具前景。最后,描述了认知能力与功能结局的关系,并解释了为何人们对补救措施重新产生兴趣。文章最后提出了对未来方向的建议。