Boonen A, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Guillemin F, Rutten-van Mölken M, Dougados M, Mielants H, de Vlam K, van der Tempel H, Boesen S, Spoorenberg A, Schouten H, van der Linden Sj
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Aug;62(8):732-40. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.8.732.
To assess direct costs associated with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). To determine which variables, including country, predict costs.
216 patients with AS from the Netherlands, France, and Belgium participated in a two year observational study and filled in bimonthly economic questionnaires. Disease related healthcare resource use was measured and direct costs were calculated from a societal perspective (true cost estimates) and from a financial perspective (country-specific tariffs). Predictors of costs were assessed using Cox's regression analysis.
209 patients provided sufficient data for cost analysis. Mean annual societal direct costs for each patient were euro;2640, of which 82% were direct healthcare costs. In univariate analysis costs were higher in the Netherlands than in Belgium, but this difference disappeared after adjusting for baseline differences in patients' characteristics among countries. Longer disease duration, lower education, worse physical function, and higher disease activity were predictors of costs. Mean annual direct costs from a financial perspective were euro;2122, euro;1402, and euro;941 per patient in the Netherlands, France, and Belgium, respectively. For each country, costs from a financial perspective were significantly lower than costs from a societal perspective.
Direct costs for AS are substantial in three European countries but not significantly different after adjusting for baseline characteristics among countries. Worse physical function and higher disease activity are important determinants of costs, suggesting better disease control might reduce the costs of AS. The difference in costs from a societal and financial perspective emphasises the importance of an economic analysis.
评估与强直性脊柱炎(AS)相关的直接成本。确定包括国家在内的哪些变量可预测成本。
来自荷兰、法国和比利时的216例AS患者参与了一项为期两年的观察性研究,并每两个月填写一次经济问卷。测量与疾病相关的医疗资源使用情况,并从社会角度(真实成本估计)和财务角度(特定国家的收费标准)计算直接成本。使用Cox回归分析评估成本的预测因素。
209例患者提供了足够的数据用于成本分析。每位患者的平均年度社会直接成本为2640欧元,其中82%为直接医疗成本。单因素分析显示,荷兰的成本高于比利时,但在调整各国患者特征的基线差异后,这种差异消失了。疾病持续时间更长、教育程度较低、身体功能较差和疾病活动度较高是成本的预测因素。从财务角度来看,荷兰、法国和比利时每位患者的平均年度直接成本分别为2122欧元、1402欧元和941欧元。对于每个国家,从财务角度计算的成本显著低于从社会角度计算的成本。
在三个欧洲国家,AS的直接成本很高,但在调整各国基线特征后并无显著差异。身体功能较差和疾病活动度较高是成本的重要决定因素,这表明更好地控制疾病可能会降低AS的成本。社会角度和财务角度成本的差异强调了经济分析的重要性。