Suppr超能文献

有无盆底电刺激的行为训练对女性压力性尿失禁的影响:一项随机对照试验

Effect of behavioral training with or without pelvic floor electrical stimulation on stress incontinence in women: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Goode Patricia S, Burgio Kathryn L, Locher Julie L, Roth David L, Umlauf Mary G, Richter Holly E, Varner R Edward, Lloyd L Keith

机构信息

Birmingham VA Medical Center, Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center/11G, 70019th St S, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2003 Jul 16;290(3):345-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.3.345.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Pelvic floor electrical stimulation (PFES) has been shown to be effective for stress incontinence. However, its role in a multicomponent behavioral training program has not been defined.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if PFES increases efficacy of behavioral training for community-dwelling women with stress incontinence.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective randomized controlled trial conducted from October 1, 1995, through May 1, 2001, at a university-based outpatient continence clinic in the United States.

PATIENTS

Volunteer sample of 200 ambulatory, nondemented, community-dwelling women aged 40 to 78 years with stress or mixed incontinence with stress as the predominant pattern; stratified by race, type of incontinence (stress only vs mixed), and severity (frequency of episodes).

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to 8 weeks (4 visits) of behavioral training, 8 weeks (4 visits) of the behavioral training plus home PFES, or 8 weeks of self-administered behavioral treatment using a self-help booklet (control condition).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was percentage reduction in the number of incontinent episodes as documented in bladder diaries. Secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction and changes in quality of life.

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat analysis showed that incontinence was reduced a mean of 68.6% with behavioral training, 71.9% with behavioral training plus PFES, and 52.5% with the self-help booklet (P =.005). In comparison with the self-help booklet, behavioral training (P =.02) and behavioral training plus PFES (P =.002) were significantly more effective, but they were not significantly different from each other (P =.60). The PFES group had significantly better patient self-perception of outcome (P<.001) and satisfaction with progress (P =.02). Significant improvements were seen across all 3 groups on the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire but with no between-group differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with PFES did not increase effectiveness of a comprehensive behavioral program for women with stress incontinence. A self-help booklet reduced incontinence and improved quality of life but not as much as the clinic-based programs.

摘要

背景

盆底电刺激(PFES)已被证明对压力性尿失禁有效。然而,其在多成分行为训练计划中的作用尚未明确。

目的

确定PFES是否能提高社区居住的压力性尿失禁女性行为训练的疗效。

设计与地点

1995年10月1日至2001年5月1日在美国一家大学门诊尿失禁诊所进行的前瞻性随机对照试验。

患者

200名年龄在40至78岁之间、能走动、无痴呆、居住在社区的女性志愿者样本,患有压力性或混合性尿失禁,以压力性尿失禁为主;按种族、尿失禁类型(仅压力性尿失禁与混合性尿失禁)和严重程度(发作频率)分层。

干预措施

患者被随机分配接受8周(4次就诊)的行为训练、8周(4次就诊)的行为训练加家庭PFES,或使用自助手册进行8周的自我管理行为治疗(对照条件)。

主要观察指标

主要结局是膀胱日记中记录的失禁发作次数减少的百分比。次要结局是患者满意度和生活质量的变化。

结果

意向性分析显示,行为训练使失禁平均减少68.6%,行为训练加PFES使失禁平均减少71.9%,自助手册使失禁平均减少52.5%(P = 0.005)。与自助手册相比,行为训练(P = 0.02)和行为训练加PFES(P = 0.002)显著更有效,但两者之间无显著差异(P = 0.60)。PFES组患者对结局的自我认知显著更好(P<0.001),对进展的满意度更高(P = 0.02)。在失禁影响问卷上,所有3组均有显著改善,但组间无差异。

结论

PFES治疗并未提高压力性尿失禁女性综合行为计划的有效性。一本自助手册减少了失禁并改善了生活质量,但不如基于诊所的计划效果好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验