Burgio Kathryn L, Goode Patricia S, Locher Julie L, Umlauf Mary G, Roth David L, Richter Holly E, Varner R Edward, Lloyd L Keith
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
JAMA. 2002 Nov 13;288(18):2293-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.18.2293.
Previous research on urge urinary incontinence has demonstrated that multicomponent behavioral training with biofeedback is safe and effective, yet it has not been established whether biofeedback is an essential component that heightens therapeutic efficacy.
To examine the role of biofeedback in a multicomponent behavioral training program for urge incontinence in community-dwelling older women.
Prospective, randomized controlled trial conducted from April 1, 1995, to March 30, 2001.
University-based outpatient continence clinic in the United States.
A volunteer sample of 222 ambulatory, nondemented, community-dwelling women aged 55 to 92 years with urge incontinence or mixed incontinence with urge as the predominant pattern. Patients were stratified by race, type of incontinence (urge only vs mixed), and severity (frequency of accidents).
Patients were randomly assigned to receive 8 weeks (4 visits) of biofeedback-assisted behavioral training (n = 73), 8 weeks (4 visits) of behavioral training without biofeedback (verbal feedback based on vaginal palpation; n = 74), or 8 weeks of self-administered behavioral treatment using a self-help booklet (control condition; n = 75).
Reduction in the number of incontinence episodes as documented in bladder diaries, patients' perceptions and satisfaction, and changes in quality of life.
Intention-to-treat analysis showed that behavioral training with biofeedback yielded a mean 63.1% reduction (SD, 42.7%) in incontinence, verbal feedback a mean 69.4% reduction (SD, 32.7%), and the self-help booklet a mean 58.6% reduction (SD, 38.8%). The 3 groups were not significantly different from each other (P =.23). The groups differed significantly regarding patient satisfaction: 75.0% of the biofeedback group, 85.5% of the verbal feedback group, and 55.7% of the self-help booklet group reported being completely satisfied with treatment (P =.001). Significant improvements were seen across all 3 groups on 3 quality-of-life instruments, with no significant between-group differences.
Biofeedback to teach pelvic floor muscle control, verbal feedback based on vaginal palpation, and a self-help booklet in a first-line behavioral training program all achieved comparable improvements in urge incontinence in community-dwelling older women. Patients' perceptions of treatment were significantly better for the 2 behavioral training interventions.
先前关于急迫性尿失禁的研究表明,生物反馈多组分行为训练是安全有效的,但生物反馈是否是提高治疗效果的关键组成部分尚未明确。
研究生物反馈在社区老年女性急迫性尿失禁多组分行为训练项目中的作用。
1995年4月1日至2001年3月30日进行的前瞻性随机对照试验。
美国一家大学门诊尿失禁诊所。
222名年龄在55至92岁之间、能自主活动、无痴呆、居住在社区的女性志愿者样本,患有急迫性尿失禁或主要为急迫性的混合性尿失禁。患者按种族、尿失禁类型(仅急迫性尿失禁与混合性尿失禁)和严重程度(意外发生频率)进行分层。
患者被随机分配接受8周(4次就诊)的生物反馈辅助行为训练(n = 73)、8周(4次就诊)的无生物反馈行为训练(基于阴道触诊的言语反馈;n = 74)或使用自助手册进行8周的自我管理行为治疗(对照组;n = 75)。
膀胱日记记录的尿失禁发作次数减少情况、患者的认知和满意度以及生活质量变化。
意向性分析显示,生物反馈行为训练使尿失禁平均减少63.1%(标准差,42.7%),言语反馈使尿失禁平均减少69.4%(标准差,32.7%),自助手册使尿失禁平均减少58.6%(标准差,38.8%)。三组之间无显著差异(P = 0.23)。三组在患者满意度方面存在显著差异:生物反馈组75.0%、言语反馈组85.5%、自助手册组55.7%报告对治疗完全满意(P = 0.001)。在三种生活质量评估工具上,所有三组均有显著改善,组间无显著差异。
在一线行为训练项目中,用于教授盆底肌肉控制的生物反馈、基于阴道触诊的言语反馈以及自助手册,在社区老年女性急迫性尿失禁方面均取得了相当的改善效果。两种行为训练干预措施在患者对治疗的认知方面明显更好。