Kalyanasundaran M, Jambulingam P, Sahu S S, Doss P S Bhoopathi, Amalraj D Dominic, Das P K
Vector Control Research Centre ICMR), Indira Nagar, Pondicherry, India.
Indian J Med Res. 2003 Jan;117:25-9.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: The resistance in vectors to conventional insecticides warrants development of newer insecticides for mosquito control besides use of other counter-measures. The present study was undertaken to test the efficacy of a new and toxicologically safe organophosphorus compound, Reldan (chlorpyrifos-methyl) and compare its efficacy with Dursban (chlorphyrifos-ethyl) against larvae of different mosquito vectors under laboratory conditions and against Culex quinquefasciatus in three larval habitats.
The susceptibility of larvae of mosquito vector species to Reldan and Dursban was determined by following the standard procedure and the LC50 in mg/l values were calculated by probit analysis. The insecticides were evaluated in the larval habitats of C. quinquefasciatus in and around Pondicherry. The percentage reduction in larval density was calculated using Mulla's formula and duration showing more than 80 per cent reduction was calculated by annotating the graph obtained by plotting percentage reduction in larval density against days of post-treatment.
Dursban and Reldan were effective against Anopheles fluviatilis larvae at lower LC50 of 5.90 x 10(-7) and 1.07 x 10(-9) mg/l respectively compared to other species of mosquitoes. Dursban and Reldan were equally effective against Aedes aegypti, An. stephensi and An. culicifacies. Reldan was about nine times more effective than Dursban against C. quinquefasciatus with respective LC50 of 1.17 x 10(-4) and 1.34 x 10(-3) mg/l. Field evaluation of these insecticides against C. quinquefasciatus showed that Reldan and Dursban at the application rate of 500 g (ai)/ha reduced immature density by more than 80 per cent for a mean duration of 4.0 and 4.5 days and 4.6 and 3.7 days in cesspits and cement tanks respectively. In U-drains, at 500 g (ai)/ha, Reldan was effective for a period of 3.6 days whereas, Dursban was not effective. It was effective for 4.0 days only at 1000 g(ai)/ha. There was no significant increase in the residual activity of both Dursban and Reldan with increase in application rates.
INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: In view of the lack of sustained control with the applications, it is inferred that these insecticides will be of limited use as larvicides against C. quinquefasciatus breeding in polluted habitats.
病媒对传统杀虫剂产生抗性,这就需要研发新型杀虫剂来控制蚊虫,同时辅以其他防控措施。本研究旨在测试一种新型且毒理学安全的有机磷化合物锐丹(甲基毒死蜱)的效果,并在实验室条件下比较其与敌敌畏(毒死蜱)对不同蚊虫病媒幼虫的效果,以及在三种幼虫栖息地中对致倦库蚊的效果。
按照标准程序测定蚊虫病媒幼虫对锐丹和敌敌畏的敏感性,并通过概率分析计算出以mg/l为单位的半数致死浓度(LC50)。在本地治里及其周边地区的致倦库蚊幼虫栖息地对这些杀虫剂进行评估。使用穆拉公式计算幼虫密度降低的百分比,并通过标注幼虫密度降低百分比与处理后天数的关系图来计算幼虫密度降低超过80%的持续时间。
与其他蚊虫种类相比,敌敌畏和锐丹对溪流按蚊幼虫的效果较好,其LC50分别为5.90×10⁻⁷和1.07×10⁻⁹mg/l。敌敌畏和锐丹对埃及伊蚊、斯氏按蚊和库氏按蚊的效果相当。锐丹对致倦库蚊的效果比敌敌畏高约九倍,其LC50分别为1.17×10⁻⁴和1.34×10⁻³mg/l。这些杀虫剂在实地对致倦库蚊的评估表明,以500g(有效成分)/公顷的施用量,锐丹和敌敌畏在污水坑和水泥池中分别使未成熟虫口密度平均在4.0天和4.5天以及4.6天和3.7天内降低超过80%。在U型排水渠中,以500g(有效成分)/公顷的施用量,锐丹的有效期为3.6天,而敌敌畏无效。仅在1000g(有效成分)/公顷时,敌敌畏的有效期为4.0天。随着施用量的增加,敌敌畏和锐丹的残留活性均未显著增加。
鉴于施用后缺乏持续控制效果,推断这些杀虫剂作为杀幼虫剂对在污染栖息地繁殖的致倦库蚊的作用有限。