• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期癌症患者临终关怀居家护理使用情况的决定因素。

Determinants of hospice home care use among terminally ill cancer patients.

作者信息

Tang Siew Tzuh

机构信息

National Yang-Ming University, School of Nursing, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Nurs Res. 2003 Jul-Aug;52(4):217-25. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200307000-00003.

DOI:10.1097/00006199-200307000-00003
PMID:12867778
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the widespread availability of hospice services for more than two decades in the United States, currently many terminally ill cancer patients who may benefit from hospice care do not receive it.

PURPOSE

To identify determinants of the use of hospice home care services for terminally ill cancer patients during their final days of life.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of data from 127 terminally ill cancer patients who participated in a prospective and exploratory study aimed at identifying determinants of congruence between the preferred and actual place of death. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify determinants of hospice home care use.

RESULTS

Sixty-four (50.4%) out of the 127 participants had used hospice home care services before death. Important determinants of hospice home care use included: (a) longer length of survival (odds ratio [OR] 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.03); (b) perceived greater family ability to achieve preferred place of death (OR: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.30-2.62); (c) home as the realistic preferred place of death (OR: 5.58; 95% CI: 1.95-16.03); (d) being female (OR: 5.37; 95% CI: 1.81-15.95); (e) lower levels of functional dependency (OR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.89-0.99); and (f) use of emergency care during the final days of life (OR: 4.03; 95% CI: 1.26-12.94).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study identified several groups of terminally ill cancer patients who were at a disadvantage to use hospice home care, including those without sufficient family resources but who required intensive nursing care. Providing nursing care that enables family care-taking at home may facilitate hospice home care use for patients.

摘要

背景

尽管临终关怀服务在美国已广泛提供了二十多年,但目前许多可能从临终关怀护理中受益的晚期癌症患者并未接受此类服务。

目的

确定晚期癌症患者在生命最后日子里使用临终关怀居家护理服务的决定因素。

方法

对127名晚期癌症患者的数据进行二次分析,这些患者参与了一项前瞻性探索性研究,旨在确定首选死亡地点与实际死亡地点一致性的决定因素。进行多因素逻辑回归分析以确定临终关怀居家护理使用的决定因素。

结果

127名参与者中有64名(50.4%)在死亡前使用过临终关怀居家护理服务。临终关怀居家护理使用的重要决定因素包括:(a)生存期较长(优势比[OR]1.02;95%置信区间[CI]:1.01 - 1.03);(b)认为家庭有更大能力实现首选死亡地点(OR:1.85;95%CI:1.30 - 2.62);(c)家是现实的首选死亡地点(OR:5.58;95%CI:1.95 - 16.03);(d)女性(OR:5.37;95%CI:1.81 - 15.95);(e)功能依赖程度较低(OR:0.94;95%CI:0.89 - 0.99);以及(f)在生命最后日子里使用过急诊护理(OR:4.03;95%CI:1.26 - 12.94)。

结论

本研究结果确定了几组在使用临终关怀居家护理方面处于不利地位的晚期癌症患者,包括那些没有足够家庭资源但需要重症护理的患者。提供能够使家庭在家中进行护理的护理服务可能会促进患者使用临终关怀居家护理。

相似文献

1
Determinants of hospice home care use among terminally ill cancer patients.晚期癌症患者临终关怀居家护理使用情况的决定因素。
Nurs Res. 2003 Jul-Aug;52(4):217-25. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200307000-00003.
2
Determinants of death in an inpatient hospice for terminally ill cancer patients.晚期癌症住院临终关怀患者的死亡决定因素。
Palliat Support Care. 2004 Dec;2(4):361-70. doi: 10.1017/s1478951504040489.
3
Determinants of congruence between the preferred and actual place of death for terminally ill cancer patients.晚期癌症患者死亡意愿地点与实际死亡地点一致性的影响因素。
J Palliat Care. 2003 Winter;19(4):230-7.
4
Determinants of the place of death among terminally ill cancer patients under home hospice care in Japan.日本居家临终关怀护理下晚期癌症患者死亡地点的决定因素。
Palliat Med. 2003 Jul;17(5):445-53. doi: 10.1191/0269216303pm782oa.
5
Determinants of hospice utilization among terminally ill geriatric patients.晚期老年患者临终关怀服务利用的决定因素
Home Health Care Serv Q. 1991;12(4):81-112. doi: 10.1300/j027v12n04_07.
6
Length of home hospice care, family-perceived timing of referrals, perceived quality of care, and quality of death and dying in terminally ill cancer patients who died at home.在家中去世的晚期癌症患者的家庭临终关怀护理时长、家属认为的转诊时机、感知到的护理质量以及死亡和临终质量。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Feb;23(2):491-9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2397-7. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
7
Barriers to hospice enrollment among lung cancer patients: a survey of family members and physicians.肺癌患者临终关怀登记的障碍:一项针对家庭成员和医生的调查
Palliat Support Care. 2008 Dec;6(4):357-62. doi: 10.1017/S1478951508000564.
8
Depression among surviving caregivers: does length of hospice enrollment matter?幸存护理人员中的抑郁情绪:临终关怀登记时长有影响吗?
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Dec;161(12):2257-62. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.12.2257.
9
When death is imminent: where terminally ill patients with cancer prefer to die and why.当死亡临近时:晚期癌症患者倾向于离世的地点及原因。
Cancer Nurs. 2003 Jun;26(3):245-51. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200306000-00012.
10
Determinants of preference for home death among terminally ill patients with cancer in Taiwan: a cross-sectional survey study.台湾地区癌症末期病患对居家死亡偏好之决定因素:一项横断面调查研究。
J Nurs Res. 2014 Mar;22(1):37-44. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000016.

引用本文的文献

1
Do Community and Caregiver Factors Influence Hospice Use at the End of Life Among Older Adults With Alzheimer Disease?社区和照料者因素是否会影响老年阿尔茨海默病患者临终时对临终关怀服务的使用?
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2012 May;14(3). doi: 10.1097/NJH.0b013e3182433a15.
2
A Literature Review on Care at the End-of-Life in the Emergency Department.急诊科临终关怀的文献综述
Emerg Med Int. 2012;2012:486516. doi: 10.1155/2012/486516. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
3
Age, gender, will, and use of home-visit nursing care are critical factors in home care for malignant diseases; a retrospective study involving 346 patients in Japan.
年龄、性别、意愿以及是否使用家庭访视护理是恶性疾病家庭护理的关键因素;日本对 346 名患者进行的回顾性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2011 Nov 1;10:17. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-10-17.
4
Inequity in the provision of and access to palliative care for cancer patients. Results from the Italian survey of the dying of cancer (ISDOC).癌症患者姑息治疗提供与可及性方面的不平等。意大利癌症临终调查(ISDOC)结果
BMC Public Health. 2007 Apr 27;7:66. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-66.