Forero Roberto, McDonnell Geoff, Gallego Blanca, McCarthy Sally, Mohsin Mohammed, Shanley Chris, Formby Frank, Hillman Ken
Simpson Centre for Health Services Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School (Liverpool Hospital) and The Australian Institute of Health Innovation (AIHI), University of New South Wales, Level 1, AGSM Building (G27), Kensington Campus, Gate 11, Botany Street, Randwick, NSW 2052, Australia.
Emerg Med Int. 2012;2012:486516. doi: 10.1155/2012/486516. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
The hospitalisation and management of patients at the end-of-life by emergency medical services is presenting a challenge to our society as the majority of people approaching death explicitly state that they want to die at home and the transition from acute care to palliation is difficult. In addition, the escalating costs of providing care at the end-of-life in acute hospitals are unsustainable. Hospitals in general and emergency departments in particular cannot always provide the best care for patients approaching end-of-life. The main objectives of this paper are to review the existing literature in order to assess the evidence for managing patients dying in the emergency department, and to identify areas of improvement such as supporting different models of care and evaluating those models with health services research. The paper identified six main areas where there is lack of research and/or suboptimal policy implementation. These include uncertainty of treatment in the emergency department; quality of life issues, costs, ethical and social issues, interaction between ED and other health services, and strategies for out of hospital care. The paper concludes with some areas for policy development and future research.
紧急医疗服务对临终患者的住院治疗和管理给我们的社会带来了挑战,因为大多数濒临死亡的人明确表示他们希望在家中离世,而且从急性护理向姑息治疗的过渡很困难。此外,在急性医院提供临终护理的成本不断攀升,难以持续。一般医院,尤其是急诊科,并不总能为临终患者提供最佳护理。本文的主要目的是回顾现有文献,以评估在急诊科管理濒死患者的证据,并确定改进领域,如支持不同的护理模式并用卫生服务研究评估这些模式。本文确定了六个缺乏研究和/或政策实施欠佳的主要领域。这些领域包括急诊科治疗的不确定性;生活质量问题、成本、伦理和社会问题、急诊科与其他卫生服务之间的互动以及院外护理策略。本文最后提出了一些政策制定和未来研究的领域。