Suppr超能文献

末次观察结转与末次观察分析。

Last observation carry-forward and last observation analysis.

作者信息

Shao Jun, Zhong Bob

机构信息

Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, 1210 W Dayton St, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2003 Aug 15;22(15):2429-41. doi: 10.1002/sim.1519.

Abstract

Drop-out often occurs in clinical trials with multiple visits and drop-out is often informative in the sense that the population of patients who dropped out is different from the population of patients who completed the study. To handle data with informative drop-out, an intention-to-treat analysis, which evaluates treatment effects over the population of all randomized patients with at least one post-treatment evaluation, is often required by the regulatory agencies. As a popular and simple intention-to-treat analysis, the last observation carry-forward (LOCF) analysis of variance (ANOVA) performs a statistical test for treatment effects by treating the last observation prior to drop-out as the observation from the last visit. Although discussions, examples and limited empirical results about the LOCF analysis can be found, its theoretical property is unclear. We find that the LOCF one-way ANOVA test is actually asymptotically valid (that is, its asymptotic size is equal to the nominal size) in the special but important case where only two treatments are compared and the two treatment groups have the same number of patients, regardless of whether drop-out is informative or not. In other cases, however, the asymptotic size of the LOCF test is different from the nominal size and is often too small when drop-out is informative, which results in a loss in power of detecting treatment effects, a disadvantage to drug companies. We propose an asymptotically valid test for comparing the global means over subpopulations, where each subpopulation contains patients dropping out after a particular visit. Some simulation results are presented to study the finite sample performance of the LOCF test and our proposed test.

摘要

在需要多次访视的临床试验中经常会出现失访情况,而且失访往往包含有用信息,因为失访患者群体与完成研究的患者群体不同。为了处理包含信息性失访的数据,监管机构通常要求进行意向性分析,即对所有至少有一次治疗后评估的随机分组患者群体评估治疗效果。作为一种常用且简单的意向性分析方法,末次观察值结转(LOCF)方差分析(ANOVA)通过将失访前的最后一次观察值视为最后一次访视的观察值来对治疗效果进行统计检验。尽管可以找到关于LOCF分析的讨论、示例和有限的实证结果,但其理论性质尚不清楚。我们发现,在仅比较两种治疗方法且两个治疗组患者数量相同的特殊但重要的情况下,无论失访是否具有信息性,LOCF单因素方差分析检验实际上是渐近有效的(即其渐近大小等于名义大小)。然而,在其他情况下,LOCF检验的渐近大小与名义大小不同,并且当失访具有信息性时,其渐近大小通常过小,这会导致检测治疗效果的功效降低,对制药公司不利。我们提出了一种用于比较亚群体总体均值的渐近有效检验方法,其中每个亚群体包含在特定访视后失访的患者。给出了一些模拟结果来研究LOCF检验和我们提出的检验的有限样本性能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验