Tong H H, Long J P, Shannon P A, DeMaria T F
Division of Otologic Research, College of Medicine and Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
Infect Immun. 2003 Aug;71(8):4289-96. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.8.4289-4296.2003.
Real-time PCR and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were used to evaluate the ability of influenza A virus and Streptococcus pneumoniae opacity variants, either alone or in combination, to induce cytokine and chemokine genes in primary cultures of human middle ear epithelial (HMEE) cells. Following treatment with influenza A virus, the induction of gene expression, which occurred in a dose- and time-dependent manner, was strong for macrophage inflammatory protein 1 alpha (MIP-1 alpha) and MIP-1 beta; moderate for tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and IL-8; and weak for IL-1 beta and monocyte chemotactic peptide 1 (MCP-1). Except for TNF-alpha, all the gene products were detected in the cell culture supernatants. In contrast, infection of HMEE cells with S. pneumoniae alone induced low levels of mRNA expression of MIP-1 alpha and MIP-1 beta and did not significantly induce the transcription of the other cytokines and chemokines examined. However, both S. pneumoniae opacity variants increased mRNA expression of MIP-1 alpha, MIP-1 beta, IL-6, and MCP-1 in HMEE cells activated by a prior influenza A virus infection compared to levels in cells treated with either agent alone. Up-regulation of IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1 mRNA expression and production by the virus in combination with opaque S. pneumoniae was two- to threefold higher than that induced by the virus combined with the transparent S. pneumoniae variant. These data indicate that the activation of HMEE cells by influenza A virus enhances the induction of cytokine and chemokine gene transcripts by S. pneumoniae and that this effect appears to be most pronounced when S. pneumoniae is in the opaque phase.
采用实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应(Real-time PCR)和酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA),评估甲型流感病毒和肺炎链球菌不透明变体单独或联合作用于原代人中耳上皮(HMEE)细胞培养物时,诱导细胞因子和趋化因子基因的能力。用甲型流感病毒处理后,基因表达的诱导呈剂量和时间依赖性,巨噬细胞炎性蛋白1α(MIP-1α)和MIP-1β的诱导作用较强;肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和IL-8的诱导作用中等;IL-1β和单核细胞趋化肽1(MCP-1)的诱导作用较弱。除TNF-α外,所有基因产物均在细胞培养上清液中检测到。相比之下,单独用肺炎链球菌感染HMEE细胞,仅诱导MIP-1α和MIP-1β的低水平mRNA表达,并未显著诱导所检测的其他细胞因子和趋化因子的转录。然而,与单独用任何一种试剂处理的细胞相比,两种肺炎链球菌不透明变体均增加了经甲型流感病毒预先感染激活的HMEE细胞中MIP-1α、MIP-1β、IL-6和MCP-1的mRNA表达。病毒与不透明肺炎链球菌联合时,IL-6、IL-8和MCP-1的mRNA表达上调及产生水平比病毒与透明肺炎链球菌变体联合时高两到三倍。这些数据表明,甲型流感病毒对HMEE细胞的激活增强了肺炎链球菌对细胞因子和趋化因子基因转录物的诱导作用,并且当肺炎链球菌处于不透明期时,这种效应似乎最为明显。