Hendryx Michael S, Russo Joan E, Stegner Bruce, Dyck Dennis G, Ries Richard K, Roy-Byrne Peter
Washington Institute for Mental Illness Research and Training, Washington State University, 310 N. Riverpoint Blvd., P. O. Box 1495, Spokane, WA 99210, USA.
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2003 Jul-Sep;30(3):342-51. doi: 10.1007/BF02287322.
The study tests whether psychiatric services utilization may be predicted from administrative databases without clinical variables equally as well as from databases with clinical variables. Persons with a psychiatric hospitalization at an urban medical center were followed for 1 year postdischarge (N = 1384.) Dependent variables included statewide rehospitalization and the number of hours of outpatient services received. Three linear and logistic regression models were developed and cross-validated: a basic model with limited administrative independent variables, an intermediate model with diagnostic and limited clinical indicators, and a full model containing additional clinical predictors. For rehospitalization, the clinical cross-validated model accounted for twice the variance accounted by the basic model (adjusted R2 = .13 and .06, respectively). For outpatient hours, the basic cross-validated model performed as well as the clinical model (adjusted R2 = .36 and .34, respectively). Clinical indicators such as assessment of functioning and co-occurring substance use disorder should be considered for inclusion in predicting rehospitalization.
该研究测试了能否同样有效地从无临床变量的行政数据库以及有临床变量的数据库中预测精神科服务的利用率。对在一家城市医疗中心有过精神科住院治疗经历的患者出院后随访1年(N = 1384)。因变量包括全州范围内的再次住院情况以及接受门诊服务的小时数。开发并交叉验证了三个线性和逻辑回归模型:一个具有有限行政自变量的基本模型、一个具有诊断和有限临床指标的中间模型以及一个包含其他临床预测因素的完整模型。对于再次住院情况,临床交叉验证模型解释的方差是基本模型的两倍(调整后的R²分别为0.13和0.06)。对于门诊小时数,基本交叉验证模型与临床模型表现相当(调整后的R²分别为0.36和0.34)。在预测再次住院情况时,应考虑纳入功能评估和共病物质使用障碍等临床指标。