• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

赖诺普利/氢氯噻嗪两种速释片在健康志愿者中的相对生物利用度。

Comparative bioavailability of two immediate-release tablets of lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide in healthy volunteers.

作者信息

Gascón A R, Cuadrado A, Solinís M A, Hernández R M, Ramírez E, Dalmau R, Pedraz J L

机构信息

Laboratory of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Txagorritxu Hospital, Vitoria, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Jul;41(7):309-15. doi: 10.5414/cpp41309.

DOI:10.5414/cpp41309
PMID:12875347
Abstract

AIM

Two formulations of lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide (20 mg/12.5 mg) were evaluated for bioequivalence after single dosing in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

The study was conducted according to an open, randomized, 2-period crossover design with a 2-week washout interval between doses. Twenty-four volunteers participated and all completed the study successfully. Lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide were determined in plasma by HPLC. The pharmacokinetic parameters AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were tested for bioequivalence after logarithmic transformation of data and ratios of tmax were evaluated non-parametrically.

RESULTS

For lisinopril, the parametric analysis revealed the following test/reference ratios and their confidence intervals (90% CI): 1.01 (0.84-1.22) for AUC(0-t), 0.98 (0.81-1.19) for AUC(0-infinity), 1.02 (0.83-1.25) for Cmax and 1.03 (0.99-1.08) for Cmax/AUC(0-infinity). The 90% CI for tmax was 0.94-1.07. All parameters showed bioequivalence between both formulations. As for hydrochlorothiazide, test/reference ratios and their confidence intervals (90% CI) were: 1.05 (0.95-1.17), 1.02 (0.93-1.12) for AUC(0-infinity), 0.99 (0.89-1.07) for Cmax and 0.97 (0.90-1.04) for Cmax/AUC(0-infinity). The 90% CI for tmax was 1.00-1.41. All parameters showed bioequivalence between both formulations except for tmax. A discrete fall in both systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure was observed after drug administration. The time course of both parameters was similar for the 2 formulations. Heart rates also followed a similar time profile.

CONCLUSIONS

The bioequivalence of the 2 formulations of lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide was demonstrated.

摘要

目的

在健康志愿者单次给药后,对两种赖诺普利/氢氯噻嗪制剂(20毫克/12.5毫克)的生物等效性进行评估。

方法

该研究按照开放、随机、两周期交叉设计进行,剂量之间有两周的洗脱期。24名志愿者参与并全部成功完成研究。通过高效液相色谱法测定血浆中的赖诺普利和氢氯噻嗪。对数据进行对数转换后,测试药代动力学参数AUC(0 - t)、AUC(0 - ∞)、Cmax和Cmax/AUC(0 - ∞)的生物等效性,并对tmax比值进行非参数评估。

结果

对于赖诺普利,参数分析显示以下测试/参比制剂的比值及其置信区间(90%CI):AUC(0 - t)为1.01(0.84 - 1.22),AUC(0 - ∞)为0.98(0.81 - 1.19),Cmax为1.02(0.83 - 1.25),Cmax/AUC(0 - ∞)为1.03(0.99 - 1.08)。tmax的90%CI为0.94 - 1.07。所有参数均显示两种制剂具有生物等效性。至于氢氯噻嗪,测试/参比制剂的比值及其置信区间(90%CI)为:AUC(0 - ∞)为1.05(0.95 - 1.17)、1.02(0.93 - 1.12),Cmax为0.99(0.89 - 1.07),Cmax/AUC(0 - ∞)为0.97(0.90 - 1.04)。tmax的90%CI为1.00 - 1.41。除tmax外,所有参数均显示两种制剂具有生物等效性。给药后观察到收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)均有明显下降。两种制剂这两个参数的时间进程相似。心率也呈现相似的时间变化趋势。

结论

证实了两种赖诺普利/氢氯噻嗪制剂的生物等效性。

相似文献

1
Comparative bioavailability of two immediate-release tablets of lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide in healthy volunteers.赖诺普利/氢氯噻嗪两种速释片在健康志愿者中的相对生物利用度。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Jul;41(7):309-15. doi: 10.5414/cpp41309.
2
Effect of the combination of lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide on the bioequivalence of tablet formulations.赖诺普利与氢氯噻嗪联用对片剂剂型生物等效性的影响。
Arzneimittelforschung. 2004 Sep;54(9A):605-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1297057.
3
Bioequivalence study of two different film-coated tablet formulations of losartan-hydrochlorothiazide in healthy volunteers.氯沙坦-氢氯噻嗪两种不同薄膜包衣片制剂在健康志愿者中的生物等效性研究。
Arzneimittelforschung. 2008;58(8):369-75. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296523.
4
Bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of lisinopril tablets by in vitro comparative dissolution test and in vivo bioequivalence test.通过体外比较溶出度试验和体内生物等效性试验对两种品牌赖诺普利片进行生物等效性评价。
Arzneimittelforschung. 2008;58(1):11-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296460.
5
Pharmacokinetics of the combined preparation of lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide on Chinese healthy volunteers.赖诺普利和氢氯噻嗪复方制剂在中国健康志愿者体内的药代动力学
Yao Xue Xue Bao. 2011 Aug;46(8):955-61.
6
Pharmacokinetic properties and bioequivalence of two irbesartan/ hydrochlorothiazide fixed-dose combination tablets in healthy male Chinese volunteers.两种厄贝沙坦/氢氯噻嗪固定剂量复方片剂在中国健康男性志愿者中的药代动力学特性及生物等效性
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Jul;53(7):573-81. doi: 10.5414/CP202208.
7
Evaluation of the bioequivalence and pharmacokinetics of two lisinopril tablet formulations after single oral administration in healthy volunteers.健康志愿者单次口服给药后两种赖诺普利片剂制剂的生物等效性和药代动力学评价。
Arzneimittelforschung. 2004;54(1):15-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296931.
8
Evaluation of the bioequivalence of two tablet formulations of enalapril/hydrochlorothiazide after single oral administration to healthy volunteers.单剂量口服两种依那普利/氢氯噻嗪片剂制剂后对健康志愿者的生物等效性评价。
Arzneimittelforschung. 2004;54(3):160-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296953.
9
Comparative bioavailability of two irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide tablet formulations in Indonesian healthy subjects.两种厄贝沙坦/氢氯噻嗪片剂剂型在印度尼西亚健康受试者中的生物利用度比较
Arzneimittelforschung. 2010;60(12):749-53. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296350.
10
Combination of losartan and hydrochlorothiazide: in vivo bioequivalence.氯沙坦与氢氯噻嗪的组合:体内生物等效性
Arzneimittelforschung. 2004 Sep;54(9A):611-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1297058.