Suppr超能文献

在植皮供皮区,粘性保留敷料比藻酸盐敷料更舒适。

Adhesive retention dressings are more comfortable than alginate dressings on split-skin-graft donor sites.

作者信息

Hormbrey E, Pandya A, Giele H

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Br J Plast Surg. 2003 Jul;56(5):498-503. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1226(03)00195-4.

Abstract

Painful split-skin-graft donor sites remain a common problem for patients. We undertook a prospective randomised trial to examine the comparative comfort and ease of care of two different donor-site dressings. One dressing is the alginate Kaltostat, the standard plastic-surgical dressing in the UK and abroad, and the other is the adhesive retention tape Mefix, a novel use of a readily available dressing. We randomised 50 patients requiring split-skin grafts to receive either alginate (Kaltostat) or retention (Mefix) donor-site dressings. Dressings were assessed by interview and questionnaire at 24, 72 h and 2 weeks, and by wound review at 2 weeks. Retention dressings were found to be more comfortable, required less nursing intervention and allowed patients easier mobility with a greater range of daily activities, especially washing, without compromising wound healing. We recommend adhesive retention dressings as cost-effective comfortable dressings, which readily conform to any donor site.

摘要

对于患者来说,取皮区疼痛仍是一个常见问题。我们进行了一项前瞻性随机试验,以比较两种不同供皮区敷料的舒适度和护理便利性。一种敷料是藻酸盐敷料Kaltostat,它是英国国内外整形手术的标准敷料;另一种是粘性固定胶带Mefix,这是一种对现有敷料的新应用。我们将50名需要接受植皮手术的患者随机分为两组,分别使用藻酸盐(Kaltostat)或固定(Mefix)供皮区敷料。在术后24小时、72小时和2周时,通过访谈和问卷对敷料进行评估,并在2周时对伤口进行检查。结果发现,固定敷料更舒适,所需的护理干预更少,患者在进行更多日常活动(尤其是洗澡)时活动更轻松,且不影响伤口愈合。我们推荐粘性固定敷料,因为它经济实惠且舒适,能很好地贴合任何供皮区。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验