• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保留肾单位手术的结果:择期与紧急指征

Outcome of nephron-sparing surgery: elective versus imperative indications.

作者信息

Kural Ali Riza, Demirkesen Oktay, Onal Bulent, Obek Can, Tunc Burcin, Onder Ali Ulvi, Yalcin Veli, Solok Vural

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Istanbul, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Urol Int. 2003;71(2):190-6. doi: 10.1159/000071845.

DOI:10.1159/000071845
PMID:12890959
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The increase in the detection of renal tumors incidentally in earlier stages has enhanced the enthusiasm for nephron-sparing surgery (NSS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed NSS in 76 patients (53 male, 23 female) with a mean age 52.3 between December 1988 and September 2001. Patients were sub-classified into 2 groups as elective or imperative indication group. They were compared regarding surgical technique, time of surgery, pathological analysis, complications, and disease free status.

RESULTS

Elective indication group (group I) with a normal contralateral kidney consisted of 50 patients, whereas there were 26 patients in the imperative indication group (group II). Tumors were incidentally detected in 63%; 74% in group I and 42% in group II. Although the mean diameter of the tumor was slightly higher in group II (39.1 vs. 36.3 mm), this difference did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). The partial nephrectomy was performed more frequently compared to enucleation in group I (90 vs. 69%, p = 0.050). However, the mean operation time as well as the mean clamping time did not differ significantly between the two groups (p > 0.05). In the histological evaluation tumors were benign in 16 (21%) and malignant in 60 patients. All of the patients but one with renal cell carcinoma had stage T1-T2 disease. Major complications were observed in 14 (18%) and 12 were from group II. Complication rate was significantly higher in group II (p = 0.000). Of 60 patients with renal cell carcinoma, 2 died of unrelated causes. One patient died with multiple visceral metastases. One patient was lost to follow-up. In the remaining 56 patients with a mean follow-up of 37.1 months (1-152), local recurrence or distant metastases were not detected. Serum creatinine levels have remained almost the same compared to preoperative levels (1.2 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.9). Overall and cancer-specific survivals were 100 and 100% in group I, 85 and 95% in group II, and 94 and 98% for the entire patient population, respectively.

CONCLUSION

NSS is an effective and reliable treatment in low stage renal tumors. It prevents unnecessary nephrectomy in benign lesions that could not be diagnosed preoperatively. However, the patients who underwent NSS with elective indication outcome with better results, compared to those with imperative indication.

摘要

引言

早期偶然发现的肾肿瘤病例增多,这激发了人们对保留肾单位手术(NSS)的热情。

患者与方法

1988年12月至2001年9月期间,我们对76例患者(男53例,女23例)实施了NSS,平均年龄52.3岁。患者被分为两组,即择期手术组或紧急手术组。比较了两组患者的手术技术、手术时间、病理分析、并发症及无病状态。

结果

对侧肾脏正常的择期手术组(I组)有50例患者,紧急手术组(II组)有26例患者。63%的肿瘤是偶然发现的;I组为74%,II组为42%。虽然II组肿瘤的平均直径略大(39.1对36.3毫米),但差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。与剜除术相比,I组更常进行部分肾切除术(90%对69%,p=0.050)。然而,两组的平均手术时间及平均阻断时间差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。组织学评估显示,16例(21%)肿瘤为良性,60例为恶性。除1例肾细胞癌患者外,所有患者的疾病分期均为T1-T2期。观察到14例(占18%)出现主要并发症,其中12例来自II组。II组的并发症发生率显著更高(p=0.000)。60例肾细胞癌患者中,2例死于无关原因。1例患者死于多发内脏转移。1例患者失访。其余56例患者平均随访37.1个月(1-152个月),未发现局部复发或远处转移。与术前水平相比,血清肌酐水平几乎保持不变(1.2±0.6对1.5±0.9)。I组的总体生存率和癌症特异性生存率分别为100%和100%,II组分别为85%和95%,全体患者分别为94%和98%。

结论

NSS是治疗低分期肾肿瘤的一种有效且可靠的方法。它避免了对术前无法诊断的良性病变进行不必要的肾切除术。然而,择期手术组接受NSS的患者比紧急手术组患者的预后更好。

相似文献

1
Outcome of nephron-sparing surgery: elective versus imperative indications.保留肾单位手术的结果:择期与紧急指征
Urol Int. 2003;71(2):190-6. doi: 10.1159/000071845.
2
Open partial nephrectomy for imperative and elective indications comparison of peri-operative data and long-term follow-up.因紧急和择期指征行开放性部分肾切除术:围手术期数据及长期随访比较
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2007;41(6):496-500. doi: 10.1080/00365590701485970.
3
[Surgical outcomes of nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumors].[肾肿瘤保留肾单位手术的外科治疗结果]
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2002 May;93(4):555-61. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.93.555.
4
Role of nephron sparing surgery in the treatment of centrally located renal tumors.保留肾单位手术在治疗肾中央部位肿瘤中的作用。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2004 Jun;76(2):51-5.
5
Imperative and elective indications for nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumors: long-term oncological follow-up.肾肿瘤保留肾单位手术的必要和选择性指征:长期肿瘤学随访
Aktuelle Urol. 2010 Jan;41 Suppl 1:S70-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1224649. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
6
[Long-term results of nephron-sparing surgery for small renal tumors with elective indications].[有选择性指征的小肾肿瘤保留肾单位手术的长期结果]
Georgian Med News. 2006 Jun(135):12-6.
7
Nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumors measuring more than 7 cm: morbidity, and functional and oncological outcomes.保留肾单位手术治疗直径大于 7cm 的肾肿瘤:发病率、肾功能和肿瘤学结局。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2014 Feb;12(1):e19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Sep 28.
8
Nephron sparing surgery for central renal tumors: experience with 33 cases.肾肿瘤保留肾单位手术治疗中央型肾肿瘤:33例经验
J Urol. 2000 Mar;163(3):737-43.
9
Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients.200例肾肿瘤患者腹腔镜与开放性部分肾切除术的对比分析
J Urol. 2003 Jul;170(1):64-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000072272.02322.ff.
10
Nephron-sparing surgery across a nation - outcomes from the British Association of Urological Surgeons 2012 national partial nephrectomy audit.全国范围内的保留肾单位手术——英国泌尿外科医师协会2012年全国性部分肾切除术审计结果
BJU Int. 2016 Jun;117(6):874-82. doi: 10.1111/bju.13353. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
A National Study of the Rate of Benign Pathology After Partial Nephrectomy for T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma: Should We Be Satisfied?一项关于T1期肾细胞癌部分肾切除术后良性病理发生率的全国性研究:我们应该满意吗?
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 17;16(20):3518. doi: 10.3390/cancers16203518.
2
Evaluation of the safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy by investigating the perioperative indicators.通过调查围手术期指标评估腹膜后腹腔镜肾部分切除术的安全性。
Front Oncol. 2023 Apr 19;13:1138210. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1138210. eCollection 2023.
3
"To Be or Not to Be Benign" at Partial Nephrectomy for Presumed RCC Renal Masses: Single-Center Experience with 195 Consecutive Patients.
肾部分切除术治疗疑似肾细胞癌肾肿物时“是良性还是非良性”:195例连续患者的单中心经验
Diseases. 2023 Feb 7;11(1):27. doi: 10.3390/diseases11010027.
4
The effect of zero-ischaemia laparoscopic minimally invasive partial nephrectomy using the modified sequential preplaced suture renorrhaphy technique on long-term renal functions.采用改良序贯预置缝线肾缝合技术的零缺血腹腔镜微创部分肾切除术对长期肾功能的影响
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017 Sep;12(3):257-263. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.67136. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
5
Perioperative complications and postoperative outcomes of partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: Does indication matter?肾细胞癌部分肾切除术的围手术期并发症及术后结果:适应证重要吗?
Indian J Urol. 2017 Apr-Jun;33(2):140-143. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.203420.
6
Reconstructive kidney surgery for organ-preserving therapy of renal tumors.用于肾肿瘤器官保留治疗的重建性肾脏手术。
GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2015 Nov 16;4:Doc10. doi: 10.3205/iprs000069. eCollection 2015.
7
[Organ and kidney function preservation in renal cell carcinoma].[肾细胞癌中器官及肾功能的保留]
Urologe A. 2014 Sep;53(9):1329-43. doi: 10.1007/s00120-014-3558-5.
8
Multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma a diagnostic dilemma: A case report in a 30-year-old woman.多房性囊性肾细胞癌:诊断难题——一名30岁女性的病例报告
Urol Ann. 2013 Apr;5(2):119-21. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.110012.