Mendes Mara Regina, Aramaki Toshiya, Hanaki Keisuke
Department of Urban Engineering, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.
Waste Manag. 2003;23(5):403-9. doi: 10.1016/S0956-053X(03)00058-8.
There is increasing concern about landfilling of biodegradable wastes. Therefore, biological treatment processes such as composting and biogasification have been considered as alternative strategies for managing those wastes. In this work, life cycle assessment was employed to compare the environmental impacts of landfilling, composting, and biological treatment of municipal solid waste in São Paulo City, Brazil. Energy consumption, recovered resources, and emissions to air and water were quantified and analyzed in terms of their potential contribution to global warming, acidification, and nutrient enrichment impact. The results demonstrated that processes that require high levels of energy consumption, such as wastewater treatment, play an important role in the outcome of environmental impact potentials. It was found that the landfilling of all waste is generally the worst strategy from an environmental point of view. However, significant reductions in the resulting impacts can be accomplished through biogasification and composting of the biodegradable fraction. Regarding composting, the application of a biofilter for gas treatment reduced significantly the gaseous emissions.
人们对可生物降解废物的填埋处理越来越担忧。因此,堆肥和生物气化等生物处理工艺被视为管理这些废物的替代策略。在这项工作中,采用生命周期评估来比较巴西圣保罗市生活垃圾填埋、堆肥和生物处理对环境的影响。对能源消耗、回收资源以及空气和水排放进行了量化,并根据它们对全球变暖、酸化和养分富集影响的潜在贡献进行了分析。结果表明,需要高能耗的工艺,如废水处理,在环境影响潜力结果中起着重要作用。研究发现,从环境角度来看,所有废物的填埋通常是最糟糕的策略。然而,通过对可生物降解部分进行生物气化和堆肥,可以显著减少由此产生的影响。关于堆肥,使用生物滤器进行气体处理可显著减少气体排放。