Cherubini Francesco, Bargigli Silvia, Ulgiati Sergio
Joanneum Research, Elisabethstrasse 5, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Waste Manag. 2008 Dec;28(12):2552-64. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.11.011. Epub 2008 Jan 29.
Landfilling is nowadays the most common practice of waste management in Italy in spite of enforced regulations aimed at increasing waste pre-sorting as well as energy and material recovery. In this work we analyse selected alternative scenarios aimed at minimizing the unused material fraction to be delivered to the landfill. The methodological framework of the analysis is the life cycle assessment, in a multi-method form developed by our research team. The approach was applied to the case of municipal solid waste (MSW) management in Rome, with a special focus on energy and material balance, including global and local scale airborne emissions. Results, provided in the form of indices and indicators of efficiency, effectiveness and environmental impacts, point out landfill activities as the worst waste management strategy at a global scale. On the other hand, the investigated waste treatments with energy and material recovery allow important benefits of greenhouse gas emission reduction (among others) but are still affected by non-negligible local emissions. Furthermore, waste treatments leading to energy recovery provide an energy output that, in the best case, is able to meet 15% of the Rome electricity consumption.
尽管有旨在加强垃圾分类以及能源和材料回收利用的强制规定,但如今填埋仍是意大利最常见的废物管理方式。在这项工作中,我们分析了选定的替代方案,旨在尽量减少运往垃圾填埋场的未使用材料部分。分析的方法框架是生命周期评估,采用了我们研究团队开发的多方法形式。该方法应用于罗马的城市固体废物(MSW)管理案例,特别关注能源和材料平衡,包括全球和地方尺度的空气排放。以效率、有效性和环境影响的指数和指标形式呈现的结果表明,在全球范围内填埋活动是最糟糕的废物管理策略。另一方面,所研究的具有能源和材料回收利用的废物处理方式能带来重要的温室气体减排效益(以及其他效益),但仍受到不可忽视的本地排放的影响。此外,能实现能源回收的废物处理方式产生的能源输出,在最佳情况下,能够满足罗马15%的电力消耗。