Omboni S, Ravogli A, Mancia G
Cattedra di Medicina Interna, Universita di Milano, Ospedale S. Gerardo, Monza, Italy.
J Hum Hypertens. 1992 Dec;6 Suppl 2:S9-13.
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is becoming increasingly popular among clinicians and investigators because of its potential to overcome the well-known limitations inherent to conventional blood pressure measurement. This paper will focus on the use of this approach in the evaluation of antihypertensive treatment. It will be argued that due to lack of prognostic validity and high cost, ABPM should not be employed routinely in treating hypertensives. It should always be employed, however, for the evaluation of the efficacy of new hypertensive drugs for which its superiority over sphygmomanometry is indisputable. This is exemplified by the results of a recent multicenter, double-blind, parallel group study on the effect of verapamil SR 240 mg, enalapril 20 mg and nitrendipine 20 mg and placebo, all administered once a day for eight weeks. Compared to placebo, all drugs reduced 24-hour mean blood pressure sufficiently. The reduction was evident throughout the daytime but nighttime blood pressure was more effectively lowered by verapamil and enalapril than by nitrendipine, documenting a difference that was not visible by using conventional measurements.
动态血压监测在临床医生和研究人员中越来越受欢迎,因为它有可能克服传统血压测量方法固有的众所周知的局限性。本文将重点讨论这种方法在评估降压治疗中的应用。有人认为,由于缺乏预后有效性和成本高昂,动态血压监测不应用于常规治疗高血压患者。然而,在评估新型降压药物的疗效时,它应始终被采用,因为其相对于血压计的优越性是无可争议的。最近一项多中心、双盲、平行组研究的结果例证了这一点,该研究考察了每天服用一次、持续八周的240毫克缓释维拉帕米、20毫克依那普利、20毫克尼群地平和安慰剂的效果。与安慰剂相比,所有药物都充分降低了24小时平均血压。这种降低在白天一整天都很明显,但维拉帕米和依那普利比尼群地平更有效地降低了夜间血压,这表明了传统测量方法无法显示的差异。