Matthews Gerald, Campbell Sian E, Falconer Shona, Joyner Lucy A, Huggins Jane, Gilliland Kirby, Grier Rebecca, Warm Joel S
Department of Psychology, University of Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA.
Emotion. 2002 Dec;2(4):315-40. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.2.4.315.
Subjective state constructs are defined within the traditional domains of affect, motivation, and cognition. Currently, there is no overarching state model that interrelates constructs within the different domains. This article reports 3 studies that provide converging evidence for 3 fundamental state dimensions labeled task engagement, distress, and worry that integrate constructs across the traditional domains. Study 1 differentiated the state dimensions by factor analysis of the scales of the Dundee Stress State Questionnaire (G. Matthews et al., 1999). Study 2 showed differential state response to performance of tasks making different cognitive demands. Study 3 showed that states are correlated with differing patterns of appraisal and coping. The 3 stress state dimensions provide a general descriptive framework consistent with transactional accounts of stress and performance.
主观状态结构是在情感、动机和认知的传统领域内定义的。目前，还没有一个将不同领域内的结构相互关联起来的总体状态模型。本文报告了三项研究，这些研究为三个基本状态维度提供了趋同的证据，这三个维度分别被标记为任务投入、痛苦和担忧，它们整合了传统领域中的各种结构。研究1通过对邓迪压力状态问卷（G. 马修斯等人，1999年）的量表进行因素分析来区分状态维度。研究2表明，对具有不同认知要求的任务表现，状态反应存在差异。研究3表明，状态与不同的评价和应对模式相关。这三个压力状态维度提供了一个与压力和表现的交互作用理论相一致的一般描述框架。
