McDaniel Grant H, Pappada Scott, Alyosif Zakaria, Teye-Lartey Solomon, Moussa Mohamad
Medical Education, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, USA.
Bioengineering, University of Toledo, Toledo, USA.
Cureus. 2025 May 21;17(5):e84542. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84542. eCollection 2025 May.
Stress and distraction are intrinsic to the emergency department (ED). These factors can invoke a physiologic response, potentially leading to performance decrements in life-saving procedures like bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation. The aim of this study is to use a simulation scenario for two reasons: (1) to evaluate how stress and distraction impact emergency medicine (EM) residents' physiology; (2) to evaluate how these factors impact BVM ventilation performance. Our hypothesis is that both factors will cause performance decrements, with stress causing increased ventilations and distraction causing disengagement and reduced ventilations.
Four EM residents were subjected to a simulation scenario comprised of three phases: (1) baseline (no stress or distraction); (2) stress (increased alarm/alerts); and (3) distraction (multiple disruptions caused by simulation center staff). Throughout the simulation each subject wore a physiologic monitor that recorded their heart rate (HR) and electrodermal activity (EDA). A high-fidelity manikin was utilized to record the BVM ventilation performance. The manikin recorded the number of ventilations delivered, duration of the ventilation and the peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) of each ventilation. To standardize physiological measures deviations of each data source relative to an algorithm-derived baseline/resting state was calculated.
The average number of ventilations per minute during phase (1) was 12.5, (2) was 16, and (3) was 11.9. The average PIP (cmHO/mL) delivered during phase (1) was 15.5, (2) was 24.4, and (3) was 22.3. Percent deviation from baseline for HR ranged from 16.9% to 38.4%, with three out of four EM residents having greater change during distraction. EDA data showed a 25-190.3% deviation from base line, with three out of four EM residents having the greatest deviation during the distraction phase.
Stress and distraction both had an impact on subject's physiologic stress response and BVM performance. While the stress phase caused the highest performance decrements, the distraction phase was associated with the more significant physiologic response and self-reported impact.
压力和干扰是急诊科固有的因素。这些因素可引发生理反应,可能导致在诸如袋阀面罩(BVM)通气等挽救生命的操作中表现下降。本研究的目的是基于两个原因使用模拟场景:(1)评估压力和干扰如何影响急诊医学(EM)住院医师的生理状况;(2)评估这些因素如何影响BVM通气性能。我们的假设是这两个因素都会导致表现下降,压力会导致通气增加,干扰会导致注意力分散和通气减少。
四名EM住院医师参与了一个由三个阶段组成的模拟场景:(1)基线期(无压力或干扰);(2)压力期(警报/警示增加);(3)干扰期(模拟中心工作人员造成的多次干扰)。在整个模拟过程中,每个受试者都佩戴了一个生理监测仪,记录他们的心率(HR)和皮肤电活动(EDA)。使用一个高保真人体模型记录BVM通气性能。人体模型记录了通气次数、通气持续时间和每次通气的吸气峰值压力(PIP)。为了标准化生理测量,计算了每个数据源相对于算法得出的基线/静息状态的偏差。
第(1)阶段每分钟的平均通气次数为12.5次,第(2)阶段为16次,第(3)阶段为11.9次。第(1)阶段输送的平均PIP(厘米水柱/毫升)为15.5,第(2)阶段为24.4,第(3)阶段为22.3。HR相对于基线的偏差百分比在16.9%至38.4%之间,四名EM住院医师中有三名在干扰期间变化更大。EDA数据显示相对于基线有25 - 190.3%的偏差,四名EM住院医师中有三名在干扰阶段偏差最大。
压力和干扰都对受试者的生理应激反应和BVM性能产生了影响。虽然压力期导致的表现下降最为严重,但干扰期与更显著的生理反应和自我报告的影响相关。