• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抑郁症、杀人行为与减轻刑事责任:苏格兰的新方向。

Depression, homicide and diminished responsibility: new Scottish directions.

作者信息

Collins Philip, White Thomas

机构信息

Michael Rutter Centre, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AZ.

出版信息

Med Sci Law. 2003 Jul;43(3):195-202. doi: 10.1258/rsmmsl.43.3.195.

DOI:10.1258/rsmmsl.43.3.195
PMID:12899423
Abstract

In a recent Scottish Appeal Court opinion (Kim Louise Scarsbrook or Galbraith v. Her Majesty's Advocate, 2001) it was successfully argued by the appellant that her conviction of murder was unsound inter-alia on the basis of overly restrictive pre-existing definitions of diminished responsibility in Scottish law resulting in unduly narrow directions being given by the trial judge to the jury in her case. We felt it timely to present a revised overview of the defence of diminished responsibility in Scotland and to consider the issues surrounding its applicability in cases of clinical depression. The psychiatric literature regarding depression and homicide is reviewed.

摘要

在苏格兰上诉法院最近的一份意见书(金·路易丝·斯卡尔斯布鲁克或加尔布雷斯诉女王陛下检察官,2001年)中,上诉人成功地辩称,对她的谋杀罪定罪是不合理的,其中一个原因是苏格兰法律中对减轻责任的预先存在的定义过于严格,导致初审法官在她的案件中向陪审团作出的指示过于狭隘。我们认为,及时对苏格兰减轻责任辩护进行修订概述,并考虑其在临床抑郁症案件中的适用性问题是很有必要的。本文回顾了关于抑郁症和杀人行为的精神病学文献。

相似文献

1
Depression, homicide and diminished responsibility: new Scottish directions.抑郁症、杀人行为与减轻刑事责任:苏格兰的新方向。
Med Sci Law. 2003 Jul;43(3):195-202. doi: 10.1258/rsmmsl.43.3.195.
2
[Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility for schizophrenic persons accused of murder: Study with experts of the Court of Appeal of Aix-en-Provence].[对被控谋杀的精神分裂症患者责任认定中精神病学专业知识的差异:与普罗旺斯地区艾克斯上诉法院专家的研究]
Encephale. 2016 Aug;42(4):296-303. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
3
The Galbraith judgment and the defence of diminished responsibility in Scotland.加尔布雷思判决与苏格兰对减轻责任的辩护。
Med Sci Law. 2005 Oct;45(4):297-302. doi: 10.1258/rsmmsl.45.4.297.
4
When killing isn't murder: psychiatric and psychological defences to murder when the insanity defence is not applicable.何时杀人不构成谋杀:在精神错乱抗辩不适用时对谋杀指控的精神科及心理学抗辩理由。
Australas Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;15(6):474-9. doi: 10.1080/10398560701616239.
5
The civil liability for damages of the criminally insane.精神病人的损害赔偿民事责任。
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2008;45(4):285-90.
6
Homicide committed by psychiatric patients: Psychiatrists' liability in Italian law cases.精神病患者实施的杀人行为:意大利法律案件中精神科医生的责任
Med Sci Law. 2016 Jan;56(1):58-64. doi: 10.1177/0025802415588120. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
7
Reducing murder to manslaughter: whose job?将谋杀降为 manslaughter:这是谁的职责? (注:“manslaughter”常见释义为“过失杀人” )
J Med Ethics. 1986 Mar;12(1):18-23. doi: 10.1136/jme.12.1.18.
8
Clark v. Arizona: diminishing the right of mentally ill individuals to a full and fair defense.克拉克诉亚利桑那州案:削弱精神病患者获得充分和公平辩护的权利。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2006;34(4):545-8.
9
Insanity defence in bipolar patients at the time of committing murder according to Iranian law: Case studies.根据伊朗法律,双相情感障碍患者在实施谋杀时的精神错乱抗辩:案例研究
Med Leg J. 2020 Mar;88(1):24-29. doi: 10.1177/0025817219876548. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
10
A terrible responsibility. Murder and the insanity defence in England 1908-1939.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2002 Jul-Aug;25(4):361-77.