• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扩展决策支持:准备与实施。

Extending decision support: preparation and implementation.

作者信息

Sepucha Karen R, Mulley Albert G

机构信息

Health Decision Research Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Jul;50(3):269-71. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00048-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00048-x
PMID:12900098
Abstract

The shift towards patient-centered care requires innovative, flexible decision-making models. Current decision aids provide information and help patients clarify values. By focusing almost exclusively on these two components, the aids miss some necessary elements that can improve decision quality. We discuss two such elements in this paper. First is avoiding the tendency to move into providing information about options and outcomes before adequate preparation. The second is the tendency to neglect to provide adequate implementation support.

摘要

向以患者为中心的护理模式转变需要创新、灵活的决策模型。当前的决策辅助工具提供信息并帮助患者明确价值观。由于几乎只专注于这两个组成部分,这些辅助工具遗漏了一些可以提高决策质量的必要要素。我们在本文中讨论其中两个要素。首先是避免在准备不足之前就倾向于提供有关选择和结果的信息。其次是倾向于忽视提供足够的实施支持。

相似文献

1
Extending decision support: preparation and implementation.扩展决策支持:准备与实施。
Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Jul;50(3):269-71. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00048-x.
2
User-centered design and the development of patient decision aids: protocol for a systematic review.以用户为中心的设计与患者决策辅助工具的开发:一项系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 26;4(1):11. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-11.
3
Patient decision aids: tools for patients and professionals.患者决策辅助工具:面向患者和专业人员的工具
Am J Nurs. 2009 Dec;109(12):60-3. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000365189.54747.ff.
4
“Nothing About Us Without Us”: Toward Patient- and Family-Centered Care.“没有我们的参与就没有关于我们的决策”:迈向以患者和家庭为中心的医疗照护。
AMA J Ethics. 2016 Jan;18(1):3-5.
5
Decision making in medicine and health care.医学与医疗保健中的决策制定。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:525-56. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144118.
6
Engaging patients using an interprofessional approach to shared decision making.采用跨专业方法进行共同决策,让患者参与其中。
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2015 Fall;25(4):455-69.
7
The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.共同决策干预对抑郁症初级护理的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Aug;67(3):324-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.023. Epub 2007 May 16.
8
Shared decision making: informing and involving patients to do the right thing in health care.共同决策:告知并让患者参与,以在医疗保健中做出正确的决策。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2012 Apr-Jun;35(2):90-8. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e318249482f.
9
Concordance in cancer medication management.癌症药物管理中的一致性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2003 May;50(1):75-8. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00084-3.
10
Ten Years, Forty Decision Aids, And Thousands Of Patient Uses: Shared Decision Making At Massachusetts General Hospital.十年,四十种决策辅助工具,以及数千次患者使用:麻省总医院的共同决策
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):630-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1376.

引用本文的文献

1
Uncertainty tolerance among primary care physicians: Relationship to shared decision making-related perceptions, practices, and physician characteristics.基层医疗医师的不确定性容忍度:与共享决策相关的认知、实践和医师特征的关系。
Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Jun;123:108232. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108232. Epub 2024 Mar 2.
2
Talking, not training, increased the accuracy of physicians' diagnosis of their patients' preferences for colon cancer screening.交流而非培训提高了医生诊断其患者对结肠癌筛查偏好的准确性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Feb;119:108047. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108047. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
3
Difficult Decisions for Older Canadians Receiving Home Care, and Why They Are So Difficult: A Web-Based Decisional Needs Assessment.
加拿大老年人接受家庭护理时面临的艰难决策及其为何如此艰难:基于网络的决策需求评估
MDM Policy Pract. 2022 Sep 16;7(2):23814683221124090. doi: 10.1177/23814683221124090. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
4
Nature of Discussions about Systemic Therapy Discontinuation or Hospice among Patients, Families, and Palliative Care Clinicians during Care for Incurable Cancer: A Qualitative Study.在为不治之症患者提供护理期间,患者、家属和姑息治疗临床医生关于停止全身治疗或选择临终关怀的讨论性质:一项定性研究。
J Palliat Med. 2020 Apr;23(4):542-547. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0402. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
5
Impact of Timing on Measurement of Decision Quality and Shared Decision Making: Longitudinal Cohort Study of Breast Cancer Patients.时机对决策质量和共享决策测量的影响:乳腺癌患者的纵向队列研究。
Med Decis Making. 2019 Aug;39(6):642-650. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19862545. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
6
Protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of strategies to promote shared decision making for hip and knee osteoarthritis (DECIDE-OA study).随机对照试验方案,评估促进髋和膝关节骨关节炎共同决策策略的比较效果(DECIDE-OA 研究)。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 24;9(2):e024906. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024906.
7
Barriers and facilitators to orthopaedic surgeons' uptake of decision aids for total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative study.骨科医生接受全膝关节置换术决策辅助工具的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 12;7(11):e018614. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018614.
8
"Many miles to go …": a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice.“路漫漫其修远兮……”:一项将患者决策支持干预措施融入常规临床实践中的系统评价。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S14. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S14. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
9
Communication preferences in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome: descriptive results and patient characteristics as predictors.纤维肌痛综合征患者的沟通偏好:描述性结果及作为预测因素的患者特征
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Jan 31;8:135-45. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S53474. eCollection 2014.
10
Measuring decision quality: psychometric evaluation of a new instrument for breast cancer surgery.测量决策质量:用于乳腺癌手术的新工具的心理计量学评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Jun 8;12:51. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-51.