Sepulveda E, Kildsig D O, Ghaly E S
School of Pharmacy, Medical Sciences Campus, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00936-5067, USA.
Pharm Dev Technol. 2003 Aug;8(3):263-75. doi: 10.1081/pdt-120022155.
The main objective of this study was to optimize the stability of cetyl alcohol/stearyl alcohol emulsions in terms of percentage of internal phase volume, emulsifier type and concentration, and amount of external phase (water). Creams (o/w emulsions) were prepared by phase inversion and physical properties as particle size of the internal phase, apparent viscosity, and sedimentation volume evaluated. Stability was performed at room temperature, 40 degrees C, 50 degrees C, and under stress conditions. High hydrophilic lipophilic balance (HLB) nonionic surfactants as tween 80, tween 20, Myrj 52, Brij 35, and low HLB span 60 were used as emulsifying agents. The percentage of internal phase components (cetyl alcohol and stearyl alcohol), percentage of emulsifying agents, and percentage of aqueous external phase were varied, and stability was investigated. As the level of emulsifier agent (tween 80 and span 60) increased from 3% to 15%, and the percent of the internal phase remained constant at 30%, the particle size of the internal phase decreased and the cream became more stable. Formulations of the same composition, but prepared using Myrj 53 and tween 20 as emulsifiers, showed a larger particle size than formulations prepared using tween 80 and Brij 35. As the level of the internal phase volume increased and consequently the amount of water decreased, emulsion viscosity increased. The best formulation containing 30% internal phase (50% cetyl alcohol, 35% stearyl alcohol), 15% emulsifying agents (tween 80/span 60 ratio of 3:1), and 70% water was selected, and effects of process temperature and cooling rate on emulsion stability investigated. This formulation was further investigated in terms of stability of a 1% hydrocortisone addition by varying the percentage (30%, 35%, 40%, and 45%) of internal phase and percentage of water (70%, 65%, 60%, and 55%). The best formulation contained 45% internal phase (22.5 g cetyl alcohol, 15.75 g stearyl alcohol, 15% emulsifying agent, which is equivalent to 5 g tween 80 and 1.7 g span 60), and 55% w/w water, was manufactured under different manufacturing processes. Emulsions prepared by homogenization at the beginning of the process of emulsification were stable with small internal phase particle diameter. This study demonstrates that at every cetyl alcohol/stearyl alcohol ratio there is a phase volume/emulsifier HLB ratio, which results in optimum stability.
本研究的主要目的是从内相体积百分比、乳化剂类型和浓度以及外相(水)的量方面优化鲸蜡醇/硬脂醇乳液的稳定性。通过相转化制备乳膏(水包油型乳液),并对内相粒径、表观粘度和沉降体积等物理性质进行评估。在室温、40℃、50℃以及应激条件下进行稳定性测试。使用高亲水亲油平衡(HLB)非离子表面活性剂如吐温80、吐温20、聚山梨醇酯52、月桂醇聚醚35以及低HLB司盘60作为乳化剂。改变内相成分(鲸蜡醇和硬脂醇)的百分比、乳化剂的百分比以及水相外相的百分比,并研究稳定性。随着乳化剂(吐温80和司盘60)水平从3%增加到15%,且内相百分比保持在30%不变时,内相粒径减小,乳膏变得更稳定。相同组成但使用聚山梨醇酯53和吐温20作为乳化剂制备的制剂,其粒径比使用吐温80和月桂醇聚醚35制备的制剂更大。随着内相体积水平增加,进而水的量减少,乳液粘度增加。选择含有30%内相(50%鲸蜡醇、35%硬脂醇)、15%乳化剂(吐温80/司盘60比例为3:1)和70%水的最佳制剂,并研究工艺温度和冷却速率对乳液稳定性的影响。通过改变内相百分比(30%、35%、40%和45%)和水的百分比(70%、65%、60%和55%),进一步研究该制剂添加1%氢化可的松后的稳定性。最佳制剂含有45%内相(22.5 g鲸蜡醇、15.75 g硬脂醇、15%乳化剂,相当于5 g吐温80和1.7 g司盘60)以及55% w/w水,在不同生产工艺下制备。在乳化过程开始时通过均质化制备的乳液具有稳定的小内相粒径。本研究表明,在每个鲸蜡醇/硬脂醇比例下,都存在一个相体积/乳化剂HLB比例,可实现最佳稳定性。