Mitchell Jeanette A
School of Allied Health Professions, Glenside Campus (Post-station 5), Faculty of Health and Social Care, University of the West of England, Blackberry Hill, Stapleton, Bristol BS16 1DD, England, United Kingdom.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003 Jul-Aug;26(6):347-51. doi: 10.1016/S0161-4754(03)00074-5.
Extreme rotation of the cervical spine may cause compromised vertebral artery (VA) blood flow. This is of particular interest to manual therapists because of the potential risks associated with these movements. The question is whether the decreased blood flow is significant and therefore likely to cause vertebrobasilar insufficiency/ischemia (VBI) and whether contralateral and ipsilateral rotations are equally affected. Several studies measuring VA blood flow have been reported. However, different parts of the VA were studied, in small samples of normal subjects and patients over a wide range of ages. Hence, the results are controversial.
To investigate intracranial VA blood flow in normal male subjects and female subjects, aged 20 to 30 years, in neutral and maximally rotated cervical spinal positions.
Transcranial Doppler sonography was used to measure intracranial VA blood flow, with the cervical spine in neutral and then rotated maximally to the left and later to the right. The sample consisted of 60 male subjects and 60 female subjects (240 VAs). Comparisons between the neutral and rotated head positions were made within and between the groups.
There was a significant decrease (P =.001) in intracranial VA blood flow following cervical spine rotation, irrespective of side but greater on the contralateral side, in the total sample and in male subjects. Female subjects had a significantly higher blood flow than male subjects, and although they showed a significant decrease with contralateral rotation, there was no significant difference in blood flow on the ipsilateral side.
Maximal rotation of the cervical spine may significantly affect vertebral artery blood flow, particularly when used in the treatment of patients with underlying vascular pathology.
颈椎的极度旋转可能导致椎动脉(VA)血流受损。由于这些动作存在潜在风险,这对手法治疗师来说尤为重要。问题在于血流减少是否显著,进而是否可能导致椎基底动脉供血不足/缺血(VBI),以及对侧和同侧旋转是否受到同等影响。已有多项测量VA血流的研究报道。然而,研究的是VA的不同部位,样本为年龄跨度较大的正常受试者和患者的小样本。因此,结果存在争议。
研究20至30岁正常男性和女性受试者在颈椎中立位和最大旋转位时颅内VA血流情况。
采用经颅多普勒超声测量颅内VA血流,颈椎先处于中立位,然后最大程度向左旋转,随后再向右旋转。样本包括60名男性受试者和60名女性受试者(共240条椎动脉)。在组内和组间对中立位和旋转头位进行比较。
颈椎旋转后,颅内VA血流显著减少(P = 0.001),无论哪一侧,但对侧减少更明显,在总样本和男性受试者中均如此。女性受试者的血流显著高于男性受试者,虽然她们在对侧旋转时血流显著减少,但同侧血流无显著差异。
颈椎最大程度旋转可能显著影响椎动脉血流,尤其是在用于治疗有潜在血管病变的患者时。