• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

五种吸入器系统用于支气管扩张剂治疗的随机交叉比较。

Randomised cross-over comparison of five inhaler systems for bronchodilator therapy.

作者信息

Harvey J, Williams J G

机构信息

Halton General Hospital, Runcorn, Cheshire.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pract. 1992 Winter;46(4):249-51.

PMID:1290733
Abstract

The pharmacological efficacy of beta-2 agonists such as bronchodilators is well established, yet many patients fail to obtain optimum benefit from conventional metered-dose inhalers. This is usually because of difficulty in achieving adequate co-ordination between activation of the aerosol and inhalation. To some extent this problem can be alleviated by detailed personal instruction and re-instruction, but the medical or paramedical staff needed to do this may be unavailable and in any case their time is expensive. To increase the benefit obtained from bronchodilators, therefore, pharmaceutical companies have produced a variety of devices, eg, large-volume (750 ml) spacers (Nebuhaler, Volumatic) which enclose a cloud of aerosol, obviating the need for actuation-inhalation co-ordination, and breath actuated dry-power inhalers with (Rotahaler, Diskhaler) or without (Turbohaler) carrier powders. Subsequent compliance with treatment is dependent upon the acceptability of the inhaler device to the patient.

摘要

β-2激动剂如支气管扩张剂的药理疗效已得到充分证实,但许多患者未能从传统的定量吸入器中获得最佳疗效。这通常是因为在气雾剂激活和吸入之间难以实现充分的协调。在某种程度上,这个问题可以通过详细的个人指导和重新指导来缓解,但进行此项工作所需的医务人员或辅助医务人员可能无法提供,而且无论如何他们的时间成本很高。因此,为了增加从支气管扩张剂中获得的益处,制药公司生产了多种装置,例如大容量(750毫升)储雾罐(Nebuhaler、Volumatic),它能围住一团气雾剂,无需激活-吸入协调,以及带(Rotahaler、Diskhaler)或不带(Turbohaler)载体粉末的呼吸驱动干粉吸入器。随后的治疗依从性取决于吸入器装置对患者的可接受性。

相似文献

1
Randomised cross-over comparison of five inhaler systems for bronchodilator therapy.五种吸入器系统用于支气管扩张剂治疗的随机交叉比较。
Br J Clin Pract. 1992 Winter;46(4):249-51.
2
Inhalatory therapy training: a priority challenge for the physician.吸入疗法培训:医师面临的一项首要挑战。
Acta Biomed. 2007 Dec;78(3):233-45.
3
Administration errors with a conventional metered dose inhaler versus a novel breath actuated device.传统定量吸入器与新型呼吸驱动装置的给药错误
Ann Allergy. 1993 Aug;71(2):103-6.
4
Bronchodilating efficacy of an open-spacer device compared to three other spacers.与其他三种吸入器相比,一种开放式吸入器的支气管扩张疗效。
Respir Care. 1992 Jan;37(1):61-4.
5
Tiotropium administered by a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) and spacer produces a similar bronchodilator response as that administered by a Rotahaler in adult subjects with stable moderate-to-severe COPD.对于患有稳定的中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的成年受试者,使用压力定量吸入器(pMDI)和储雾罐给药的噻托溴铵产生的支气管扩张反应与使用旋转式吸入器给药的相似。
Respir Med. 2007 Dec;101(12):2464-71. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.07.006. Epub 2007 Aug 24.
6
Are outcomes the same with all dry powder inhalers?所有干粉吸入器的治疗效果都一样吗?
Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2005 Dec(149):33-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-504X.2005.00726.x.
7
Inhaler use in children with asthma.哮喘儿童使用吸入器的情况。
Dan Med Bull. 1987 Oct;34(5):234-49.
8
[Inhalation chambers: an alternative to the conventional inhalator?].[吸入室:传统吸入器的替代品?]
Med Clin (Barc). 1993 Jun 19;101(4):125-7.
9
[Aerosol therapy].[雾化治疗]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1998 Aug 15;128(33):1223-8.
10
Inhaler technique in older people in the community.社区中老年人的吸入器使用技巧。
Age Ageing. 2004 Mar;33(2):185-8. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afh062.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating inhaler use technique in COPD patients.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的吸入器使用技术。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Jul 8;10:1291-8. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S85681. eCollection 2015.
2
Overcoming gaps in the management of asthma in older patients: new insights.克服老年患者哮喘管理中的差距:新见解
Drugs Aging. 2005;22(12):1029-59. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200522120-00004.
3
Pressurised metered-dose inhalers versus all other hand-held inhalers devices to deliver bronchodilators for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
压力定量吸入器与所有其他手持吸入装置用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者支气管扩张剂给药的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(1):CD002170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002170.
4
Pressurised metered dose inhalers versus all other hand-held inhaler devices to deliver beta-2 agonist bronchodilators for non-acute asthma.压力定量吸入器与所有其他手持吸入装置用于非急性哮喘患者递送β-2激动剂支气管扩张剂的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(1):CD002158. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002158.
5
Improving outcomes in elderly patients with asthma.改善老年哮喘患者的治疗效果。
Drugs Aging. 1999 Jan;14(1):1-9. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199914010-00001.
6
Evaluation of the effectiveness of four different inhalers in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.评估四种不同吸入器对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的有效性。
Thorax. 1995 Nov;50(11):1183-7. doi: 10.1136/thx.50.11.1183.
7
Antiasthma drug delivery. What is on the horizon?抗哮喘药物递送。未来会怎样?
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1994 Aug;27(2):85-93. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199427020-00001.