Suppr超能文献

与静脉注射/口服阿莫西林克拉维酸联合或不联合克拉霉素相比,序贯静脉注射/口服莫西沙星治疗社区获得性肺炎的经济学评价。

An economic evaluation of sequential i.v./po moxifloxacin therapy compared to i.v./po co-amoxiclav with or without clarithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

作者信息

Drummond Michael F, Becker Debbie L, Hux Margaret, Chancellor Jeremy V M, Duprat-Lomon Isabelle, Kubin Rolf, Sagnier Pierre-Philippe

机构信息

Innovus Research (UK) Ltd, High Wycombe, Bucks, UK.

出版信息

Chest. 2003 Aug;124(2):526-35. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.2.526.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate costs, clinical consequences, and cost-effectiveness from a German and French health-care system perspective of sequential i.v./po moxifloxacin monotherapy compared to co-amoxiclav with or without clarithromycin (AMC +/- CLA) in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) who required parenteral treatment.

METHODS

Costs and consequences over 21 days were evaluated based on clinical cure rates 5 to 7 days after treatment and health resource use reported for the TARGET multinational, prospective, randomized, open-label trial. This trial compared sequential i.v./po monotherapy with moxifloxacin (400 mg qd) to i.v./po co-amoxiclav (1.2 g i.v./625 mg po tid) with or without clarithromycin (500 mg bid) for 7 to 14 days in hospitalized patients with CAP. Since no country-by-treatment interaction was found in spite of some country differences for length of hospital stays, resource data (antimicrobial treatment, hospitalization, and out-of-hospital care) from all centers were pooled and valued using German and French unit prices to estimate CAP-related cost to the German Sickness Funds and French public health-care sector, respectively.

RESULTS

Compared to AMC +/- CLA, treatment with moxifloxacin resulted in 5.3% more patients achieving clinical cure 5 to 7 days after therapy (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 11.8%), increased speed of response (1 day sooner for median time to first return to apyrexia, p = 0.008), and a reduction in hospital stay by 0.81 days (95% CI, - 0.01 to 1.63) within the 21-day time frame. Treatment with moxifloxacin resulted in savings of 266 euro and 381 euro for Germany and France respectively, primarily due to the shorter length of hospital stay. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves show moxifloxacin has a > or = 95% chance of being cost saving from French and German health-care perspectives, and higher probability of being cost-effective at acceptability thresholds up to 2,000 euro per additional patient cured.

CONCLUSION

i.v./po monotherapy with moxifloxacin shows clinical benefits including increased speed of response and is cost-effective compared to i.v./po AMC +/- CLA in the treatment of CAP.

摘要

研究目的

从德国和法国医疗保健系统的角度,评估序贯静脉注射/口服莫西沙星单药治疗与含或不含克拉霉素的阿莫西林/克拉维酸(AMC±CLA)相比,在需要肠外治疗的社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者中的成本、临床后果及成本效益。

方法

基于治疗后5至7天的临床治愈率以及TARGET跨国、前瞻性、随机、开放标签试验报告的卫生资源使用情况,评估21天内的成本和后果。该试验将序贯静脉注射/口服莫西沙星(400mg,每日一次)与静脉注射/口服阿莫西林/克拉维酸(1.2g静脉注射/625mg口服,每日三次)含或不含克拉霉素(500mg,每日两次)治疗7至14天用于住院CAP患者进行比较。尽管不同国家的住院时间存在差异,但未发现治疗与国家之间的相互作用,因此汇总了所有中心的资源数据(抗菌治疗、住院和院外护理),并使用德国和法国的单位价格进行估值,以分别估算德国疾病基金和法国公共卫生保健部门与CAP相关的成本。

结果

与AMC±CLA相比,莫西沙星治疗使更多患者(多5.3%)在治疗后5至7天实现临床治愈(95%置信区间[CI],1.2%至11.8%),反应速度加快(首次恢复无热的中位时间提前1天,p = 0.008),并且在21天时间范围内住院时间缩短0.81天(95%CI,-0.01至1.63)。莫西沙星治疗分别为德国和法国节省了266欧元和381欧元,主要是由于住院时间缩短。成本效益可接受性曲线显示,从法国和德国医疗保健角度来看,莫西沙星有≥95%的可能性节省成本,并且在每治愈一名额外患者的可接受阈值高达2000欧元时,具有更高的成本效益可能性。

结论

静脉注射/口服莫西沙星单药治疗在治疗CAP方面显示出临床益处,包括反应速度加快,并且与静脉注射/口服AMC±CLA相比具有成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验