• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

莫西沙星单药治疗与阿莫西林 - 克拉维酸加罗红霉素治疗有风险因素的成人非重症社区获得性肺炎的比较。

Moxifloxacin monotherapy compared to amoxicillin-clavulanate plus roxithromycin for nonsevere community-acquired pneumonia in adults with risk factors.

作者信息

Portier H, Brambilla C, Garre M, Paganin F, Poubeau P, Zuck P

机构信息

CHU de Dijon, Hôpital du Bocage, BP 1542, 21034 Dijon Cedex, France.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005 Jun;24(6):367-76. doi: 10.1007/s10096-005-1347-1.

DOI:10.1007/s10096-005-1347-1
PMID:15944847
Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin versus amoxicillin-clavulanate plus roxithromycin (comparator) in adult community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients with risk factors. In this comparative, randomized, multicenter, open-label study, patients hospitalized for CAP received a 10-day oral treatment with either moxifloxacin (400 mg o.d.) or amoxicillin-clavulanate (1,000/125 mg t.i.d.) plus roxithromycin (150 mg b.i.d.). Clinical and bacteriological outcomes were assessed during test of cure and follow-up visits (5-7 days and 21-28 days after the end of treatment, respectively). Of 349 randomized patients, 346 were included in the intent-to-treat analysis and 289 in the per-protocol analysis. Their baseline characteristics were comparable. The most frequent risk factors for mortality were age >65 years (50.0%), alcoholism (23.1%), and comorbidities (50.6%); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (25.4%) and diabetes mellitus (13.6%) were the most common associated comorbidities. A causative pathogen was documented in 66 of 346 (19.1%) of the patients (including 21 with positive blood cultures). Respective per-protocol clinical success rates at test-of-cure (primary efficacy endpoint) for moxifloxacin and comparator were 131 of 151 (86.8%) and 120 of 138 (87.0%), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of -8.0-7.6 for the difference. Bacteriological success rates (eradication) were 23 of 30 (76.7%) and 23 of 31 (74.2%); rates for patients with positive blood cultures were 10 of 14 and 4 of 6. Persistent clinical success rates at follow-up were 118 of 120 (98.3%) and 102 of 106 (96.2%), with a 95%CI of -2.2-6.4 for the difference. The intent-to-treat analysis confirmed these results. Adverse events associated with moxifloxacin and the comparator drug were reported for 42 of 171 (24.6%) and 50 of 175 (28.6%) of the patients, respectively, and comprised predominantly digestive disorders, which occurred in 9.4% and 21.1%. On the basis of these results, once-daily oral moxifloxacin alone is as effective as amoxicillin-clavulanate plus roxithromycin for the treatment of CAP in patients with risk factors.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估莫西沙星与阿莫西林-克拉维酸加罗红霉素(对照药)在有危险因素的成年社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者中的疗效和安全性。在这项比较性、随机、多中心、开放标签研究中,因CAP住院的患者接受为期10天的口服治疗,治疗药物为莫西沙星(400mg,每日一次)或阿莫西林-克拉维酸(1000/125mg,每日三次)加罗红霉素(150mg,每日两次)。在治愈测试和随访期间(分别在治疗结束后5 - 7天和21 - 28天)评估临床和细菌学结果。349例随机分组的患者中,346例纳入意向性分析,289例纳入符合方案分析。他们的基线特征具有可比性。最常见的死亡危险因素为年龄>65岁(50.0%)、酗酒(23.1%)和合并症(50.6%);慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)(25.4%)和糖尿病(13.6%)是最常见的相关合并症。346例患者中有66例(19.1%)记录到致病病原体(包括21例血培养阳性患者)。莫西沙星和对照药在治愈测试(主要疗效终点)时各自的符合方案临床成功率分别为151例中的131例(86.8%)和138例中的120例(87.0%),差异的95%置信区间(CI)为 - 8.0 - 7.6。细菌学成功率(根除)分别为30例中的23例(76.7%)和31例中的23例(74.2%);血培养阳性患者的成功率分别为14例中的10例和6例中的4例。随访时持续临床成功率分别为120例中的118例(98.3%)和106例中的102例(96.2%),差异的95%CI为 - 2.2 - 6.4。意向性分析证实了这些结果。分别有171例患者中的42例(24.6%)和175例患者中的50例(28.)报告了与莫西沙星和对照药相关的不良事件,主要包括消化系统疾病,发生率分别为9.4%和21.1%。基于这些结果,对于有危险因素的CAP患者,单用每日一次口服莫西沙星与阿莫西林-克拉维酸加罗红霉素的疗效相当。

相似文献

1
Moxifloxacin monotherapy compared to amoxicillin-clavulanate plus roxithromycin for nonsevere community-acquired pneumonia in adults with risk factors.莫西沙星单药治疗与阿莫西林 - 克拉维酸加罗红霉素治疗有风险因素的成人非重症社区获得性肺炎的比较。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005 Jun;24(6):367-76. doi: 10.1007/s10096-005-1347-1.
2
Moxifloxacin monotherapy is effective in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: the MOTIV study--a randomized clinical trial.莫西沙星单药治疗对社区获得性肺炎住院患者有效:MOTIV研究——一项随机临床试验
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 May 15;46(10):1499-509. doi: 10.1086/587519.
3
Randomized controlled trial of sequential intravenous (i.v.) and oral moxifloxacin compared with sequential i.v. and oral co-amoxiclav with or without clarithromycin in patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring initial parenteral treatment.在需要初始肠外治疗的社区获得性肺炎患者中,序贯静脉注射(i.v.)和口服莫西沙星与序贯静脉注射和口服阿莫西林克拉维酸钾(联合或不联合克拉霉素)的随机对照试验。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Jun;46(6):1746-54. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.6.1746-1754.2002.
4
Randomized controlled trial of moxifloxacin compared with piperacillin-tazobactam and amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections.莫西沙星与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦及阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗复杂性腹腔内感染的随机对照试验
Ann Surg. 2006 Aug;244(2):204-11. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000230024.84190.a8.
5
Treating diabetic foot infections with sequential intravenous to oral moxifloxacin compared with piperacillin-tazobactam/amoxicillin-clavulanate.与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦/阿莫西林-克拉维酸相比,序贯静脉注射至口服莫西沙星治疗糖尿病足感染。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Aug;60(2):370-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm130. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
6
Moxifloxacin vs amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute sinusitis.莫西沙星与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗急性鼻窦炎的比较
Am J Otolaryngol. 2007 Mar-Apr;28(2):78-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2006.06.016.
7
A randomized trial of the efficacy and safety of sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin monotherapy versus intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam followed by oral amoxicillin/clavulanate for complicated skin and skin structure infections.一项比较序贯静脉/口服莫西沙星单药治疗与静脉注射哌拉西林/他唑巴坦后继以口服阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗复杂性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的疗效和安全性的随机试验。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Nov;66(11):2632-42. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr344. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
8
Double-blind, randomized study of the efficacy and safety of oral pharmacokinetically enhanced amoxicillin-clavulanate (2,000/125 milligrams) versus those of amoxicillin-clavulanate (875/125 milligrams), both given twice daily for 7 days, in treatment of bacterial community-acquired pneumonia in adults.口服药代动力学增强型阿莫西林-克拉维酸(2000/125毫克)与阿莫西林-克拉维酸(875/125毫克)治疗成人细菌性社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性的双盲随机研究,两者均每日给药两次,持续7天。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004 Sep;48(9):3323-31. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.9.3323-3331.2004.
9
Safety and efficacy of sequential i.v. to p.o. moxifloxacin versus conventional combination therapies for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in patients requiring initial i.v. therapy.对于需要初始静脉治疗的社区获得性肺炎患者,静脉注射序贯至口服莫西沙星与传统联合疗法的安全性和有效性。
J Emerg Med. 2004 Nov;27(4):395-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.02.023.
10
Moxifloxacin versus amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in outpatient acute exacerbations of COPD: MAESTRAL results.莫西沙星对比阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗 COPD 门诊急性加重:MAESTRAL 研究结果。
Eur Respir J. 2012 Jul;40(1):17-27. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00090311. Epub 2011 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying the Best Initial Oral Antibiotics for Adults with Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Network Meta-Analysis.社区获得性肺炎成人患者最佳初始口服抗生素的选择:一项网络荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 May;39(7):1214-1226. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08674-1. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
2
The Effect of Macrolides on Mortality in Bacteremic Pneumococcal Pneumonia: A Retrospective, Nationwide Cohort Study, Israel, 2009-2017.大环内酯类药物对菌血症性肺炎链球菌肺炎死亡率的影响:一项回顾性、全国性队列研究,以色列,2009-2017 年。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Dec 19;75(12):2219-2224. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac317.
3
Cost Effectiveness of Different Initial Antimicrobial Regimens for Elderly Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients in General Ward.

本文引用的文献

1
QT prolongation and fatal arrhythmias: a review of clinical implications and effects of drugs.QT间期延长与致命性心律失常:药物的临床影响及作用综述
Am J Ther. 2003 Nov-Dec;10(6):452-7. doi: 10.1097/00045391-200311000-00013.
2
[A comparison of moxifloxacin and amoxicillin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in Latin America: results of a multicenter clinical trial].[莫西沙星与阿莫西林治疗拉丁美洲社区获得性肺炎的比较:一项多中心临床试验结果]
Arch Bronconeumol. 2003 Sep;39(9):387-93. doi: 10.1016/s0300-2896(03)75413-1.
3
[Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization in immunocompetent elderly patients: clinical features, prognostic factors and treatment].
普通病房中老年社区获得性肺炎患者不同初始抗菌治疗方案的成本效益
Infect Drug Resist. 2021 May 18;14:1845-1853. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S302852. eCollection 2021.
4
Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Community-acquired Pneumonia. An Official Clinical Practice Guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America.成人社区获得性肺炎诊断和治疗。美国胸科学会和美国传染病学会的官方临床实践指南。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct 1;200(7):e45-e67. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201908-1581ST.
5
Respiratory Fluoroquinolones Monotherapy vs. β-Lactams With or Without Macrolides for Hospitalized Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients: A Meta-Analysis.呼吸喹诺酮类单药治疗与β-内酰胺类联合或不联合大环内酯类治疗住院社区获得性肺炎患者的Meta分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2019 May 8;10:489. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00489. eCollection 2019.
6
Comparative Outcome Analysis of Penicillin-Based Versus Fluoroquinolone-Based Antibiotic Therapy for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.基于青霉素与基于氟喹诺酮的抗生素疗法治疗社区获得性肺炎的比较结局分析:一项全国性基于人群的队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(6):e2763. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002763.
7
Comparative Treatment Failure Rates of Respiratory Fluoroquinolones or β-Lactam + Macrolide Versus β-Lactam Alone in the Treatment for Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adult Outpatients: An Analysis of a Nationally Representative Claims Database.呼吸氟喹诺酮类药物或β-内酰胺类+大环内酯类药物与单用β-内酰胺类药物治疗成人门诊社区获得性肺炎的比较治疗失败率:一项基于全国代表性索赔数据库的分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(39):e1662. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001662.
8
What Is New in Antibiotic Therapy in Community-Acquired Pneumonia? An Evidence-Based Approach Focusing on Combined Therapy.社区获得性肺炎抗生素治疗的新进展有哪些?一种聚焦联合治疗的循证方法。
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2015 Oct;17(10):501. doi: 10.1007/s11908-015-0501-x.
9
Efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin in community acquired pneumonia: a prospective, multicenter, observational study (CAPRIVI).莫西沙星治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性:一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究(CAPRIVI)。
BMC Pulm Med. 2014 Jun 30;14:105. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-14-105.
10
Assessment of bias in outcomes reported in trials on pneumonia: a systematic review.肺炎试验中报告结果的偏倚评估:一项系统评价
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Jun;33(6):969-74. doi: 10.1007/s10096-013-2034-2. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
[免疫功能正常的老年患者中需要住院治疗的社区获得性肺炎:临床特征、预后因素及治疗]
Arch Bronconeumol. 2003 Aug;39(8):333-40. doi: 10.1016/s0300-2896(03)75400-3.
4
Factors associated with hospitalization costs for patients with community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎患者住院费用的相关因素。
Clin Ther. 2003 Feb;25(2):593-610. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80099-1.
5
Effectiveness of oral moxifloxacin in standard first-line therapy in community-acquired pneumonia.口服莫西沙星在社区获得性肺炎标准一线治疗中的有效性。
Eur Respir J. 2003 Jan;21(1):135-43. doi: 10.1183/09031936.03.00045202.
6
Comparison of the in vitro activities of several new fluoroquinolones against respiratory pathogens and their abilities to select fluoroquinolone resistance.几种新型氟喹诺酮类药物对呼吸道病原体的体外活性及其诱导氟喹诺酮耐药性能力的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002 Oct;50(4):495-502. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkf152.
7
Randomized controlled trial of sequential intravenous (i.v.) and oral moxifloxacin compared with sequential i.v. and oral co-amoxiclav with or without clarithromycin in patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring initial parenteral treatment.在需要初始肠外治疗的社区获得性肺炎患者中,序贯静脉注射(i.v.)和口服莫西沙星与序贯静脉注射和口服阿莫西林克拉维酸钾(联合或不联合克拉霉素)的随机对照试验。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Jun;46(6):1746-54. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.6.1746-1754.2002.
8
The efficacy and safety of two oral moxifloxacin regimens compared to oral clarithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.与口服克拉霉素相比,两种口服莫西沙星治疗方案在社区获得性肺炎治疗中的疗效和安全性。
Respir Med. 2001 Jul;95(7):553-64. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2001.1113.
9
Oral moxifloxacin vs high-dosage amoxicillin in the treatment of mild-to-moderate, community-acquired, suspected pneumococcal pneumonia in adults.口服莫西沙星与高剂量阿莫西林治疗成人轻至中度社区获得性疑似肺炎球菌肺炎的疗效比较
Chest. 2001 Jan;119(1):185-95. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.1.185.
10
Process of care performance, patient characteristics, and outcomes in elderly patients hospitalized with community-acquired or nursing home-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性或养老院获得性肺炎住院老年患者的护理过程表现、患者特征及预后
Chest. 2000 May;117(5):1378-85. doi: 10.1378/chest.117.5.1378.