Suppr超能文献

干扰素再治疗对慢性丙型肝炎干扰素抵抗患者的疗效

Efficacy of interferon retreatment on interferon-resistant patients with chronic hepatitis C.

作者信息

Egusa Kuniyuki, Kondo Junichi

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Fukuyama National Hospital, Hiroshima 720-0825, Japan.

出版信息

Acta Med Okayama. 2003 Jun;57(3):151-8. doi: 10.18926/AMO/32832.

Abstract

Chronic Hepatitis C can progress to end-stage liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. Interferon (IFN) therapy is effective in clearing the hepatitis C virus and in improving liver histology, however, few patients maintain a sustained response (SR) after IFN withdrawal. Immediate retreatment with IFN is therefore considered to be both effective and necessary, especially for patients who do not respond to the initial course of IFN therapy. All 145 patients included in the present study underwent liver biopsy, followed by a first treatment course with various IFNs (alpha2a, alpha2b, alpha, OIF or beta). If hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA was positive after the first treatment, the patient was assigned to one of 3 groups, depending on whether his or her alanine transaminase (ALT)level was normalized (incomplete response, IR), partially responsive(PR), or non-responsive (NR). After an observational interval of 6 to 76 months, a second IFN treatment was initiated with a higher dose or the same dose of the same IFN for the IR group, and with a different IFN for the PR and NR groups. At 6 months after retreatment with IFN, the overall efficacy of the retreatment was 29.7.% In the case of the IR group, who received the same IFN, the overall efficacy was 45.2%. In patients identified as non-SR after the first treatment, who received a different type of IFN for retreatment, the overall efficacy was 18.6%. Anti-IFN antibody was not detected in most of the breakthrough cases. For some IR patients, retreatment with the same IFN was effective. Anti-IFN antibody was mostly negative, indicating that the same IFN can be used in both the first treatment and retreatment to obtain an SR. Switching to a different IFN was effective for some PR and NR patients, suggesting that changing IFN for such cases is a good therapeutic choice.

摘要

慢性丙型肝炎可进展为终末期肝硬化或肝细胞癌。干扰素(IFN)治疗对于清除丙型肝炎病毒及改善肝脏组织学状况有效,然而,很少有患者在停用干扰素后能维持持续应答(SR)。因此,立即再次使用干扰素治疗被认为既有效又必要,尤其对于那些对初始干扰素治疗无反应的患者。本研究纳入的145例患者均接受了肝活检,随后接受了不同干扰素(α2a、α2b、α、OIF或β)的首个疗程治疗。如果在首个疗程治疗后丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)RNA呈阳性,则根据患者的丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)水平是否恢复正常(不完全应答,IR)、部分应答(PR)或无应答(NR),将患者分为3组之一。经过6至76个月的观察期后,对于IR组,使用更高剂量或相同剂量的同一种干扰素启动第二个干扰素疗程,对于PR组和NR组,则使用不同的干扰素。在再次使用干扰素治疗6个月后,再次治疗的总体有效率为29.7%。对于接受相同干扰素治疗的IR组,总体有效率为45.2%。对于在首个疗程治疗后被确定为无持续应答且接受不同类型干扰素再次治疗的患者,总体有效率为18.6%。在大多数突破病例中未检测到抗干扰素抗体。对于一些IR患者,使用相同的干扰素再次治疗有效。抗干扰素抗体大多为阴性,这表明在首个疗程治疗和再次治疗中均可使用相同的干扰素以获得持续应答。对于一些PR和NR患者,换用不同的干扰素有效,这表明对于此类患者更换干扰素是一个不错的治疗选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验