Felton Barbara J
Rutgers University, USA.
Community Ment Health J. 2003 Aug;39(4):309-22. doi: 10.1023/a:1024020124397.
Seeking to identify conditions that support newly implemented evidence-based practices, this case study examined an implementation in which an existing agency was invited to move into the neighboring county to introduce its "housing first" practice with seriously mentally ill homeless adults. Using a constructivist methodology to elicit the narratives of key actors and observers about the implementation and its attendant controversy, this study found three issues at the core of actors' experiences: mode of presentation, use of an outside agency and the questioned uniqueness of the new practice. Barriers rather than facilitators dominated participants' interpretations of events despite significant researcher-observed facilitators.
为了确定支持新实施的循证实践的条件,本案例研究考察了一项实施情况,即邀请一个现有机构进驻邻县,向患有严重精神疾病的无家可归成年人推行其“住房优先”实践。本研究采用建构主义方法,引出关键行动者和观察者关于该实施情况及其伴随争议的叙述,发现行动者经历的核心有三个问题:呈现方式、外部机构的使用以及新实践的独特性受到质疑。尽管研究人员观察到有显著的促进因素,但障碍而非促进因素主导了参与者对事件的解读。