Green L W, Mercer S L
Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341-3724, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2001 Dec;91(12):1926-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.12.1926.
Responding to growing impatience with the limited application of research findings to health practices and policies, both funding bodies and communities are demanding that research show greater sensitivity to communities' perceptions, needs, and unique circumstances. One way to assure this is to employ participatory research-to engage communities at least in formulating research questions and interpreting and applying research findings and possibly also in selecting methods and analyzing data. "Community" should be interpreted broadly as all who will be affected by the research results, including lay residents of a local area, practitioners, service agencies, and policymakers. Participatory research should not be required of every project, but when results are to be used for, in, and by communities, those communities should collaborate not only in applying findings but also in determining the ways in which the findings are produced and interpreted.
鉴于研究成果在健康实践和政策中的应用有限,资金提供机构和社区对此日益不耐烦,双方都要求研究对社区的观念、需求和独特情况表现出更高的敏感度。确保这一点的一种方法是采用参与式研究,即至少让社区参与制定研究问题、解读和应用研究结果,也可能包括选择方法和分析数据。“社区”应被广泛理解为所有将受研究结果影响的人,包括当地居民、从业者、服务机构和政策制定者。并非每个项目都需要采用参与式研究,但当研究结果要为社区所用、在社区中应用以及由社区应用时,这些社区不仅应在应用研究结果方面进行合作,还应在确定研究结果的产生和解读方式方面进行合作。