Shreeves Gavin, Cant Michael A, Bolton Alan, Field Jeremy
Department of Biology, University College London, Wolfson House, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE, UK.
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Aug 7;270(1524):1617-22. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2409.
Recent explanations for the evolution of eusociality, focusing more on costs and benefits than relatedness, are largely untested. We validate one such model by showing that helpers in foundress groups of the paper wasp Polistes dominulus benefit from an insurance-based mechanism known as Assured Fitness Returns (AFRs). Experimental helper removals left remaining group members with more offspring than they would normally rear. Reduced groups succeeded in preserving the dead helpers' investment by rearing these extra offspring, even when helper removals occurred long before worker emergence. While helpers clearly gained from AFRs, offspring of lone foundresses failed after foundress death, so that AFRs represent a true advantage for helpers. Smaller, less valuable offspring were probably sacrificed to feed larger offspring, but reduced groups did not preferentially attract joiners or increase their foraging effort to compensate for their smaller workforce. We failed to detect a second insurance-based advantage, Survivorship Insurance, in which larger groups are less likely to fail than smaller groups. We suggest that through their use of small offspring as a food store to cope with temporary shortages, wasps may be less susceptible than vertebrates to offspring failure following the death of group members.
近期对真社会性进化的解释更多地关注成本和收益而非亲缘关系,这些解释大多未经检验。我们通过表明纸巢蜂Polistes dominulus的创始群体中的帮手受益于一种名为“保证适合度回报”(AFRs)的基于保险的机制,来验证这样一个模型。实验性地移除帮手后,剩余群体成员所养育的后代比正常情况下更多。即使在工蜂出现之前很久就移除了帮手,规模减小的群体仍成功地通过养育这些额外的后代来保留死去帮手的投资。虽然帮手显然从AFRs中获益,但单独的雌蜂死亡后,其后代会夭折,所以AFRs对帮手来说是真正的优势。较小、价值较低的后代可能会被牺牲以喂养较大的后代,但规模减小的群体并没有优先吸引加入者,也没有增加觅食努力来弥补其较小的劳动力规模。我们未能检测到另一种基于保险的优势,即生存保险,在这种保险中,较大的群体比较小的群体更不容易失败。我们认为,通过利用小后代作为应对暂时短缺的食物储备,黄蜂可能比脊椎动物更不容易在群体成员死亡后出现后代夭折的情况。