Roger France Francis H
Health Services Research, Centre for Medical Informatics, School of Public Health and St Luc Hospital, Université Catholique de Louvain, 10 Avenue Hippocrate, Boîte 3718, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Int J Med Inform. 2003 Jul;70(2-3):215-9. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(03)00044-3.
Diagnosis related groups (DRGs) were the first health management tool to group patients in clinical meaningful categories with homogeneous resources consumption. They belong to case mix measures that have been introduced in the USA in the seventies to identify clinical differences in groups of patients as well as to document variation in hospitals and physicians practices by comparing similar groups with each others. They are also used to adjust payment rates and to improve quality of care. This innovative concept migrated from the USA to several Western European countries and to Australia first, to Eastern Europe and Asia soon thereafter. The main objective in most countries concerns a hospital financing new methodology, based on similar groups of patients, by applying a global budget. The main result of this international overview of 25 countries is to show the difficulty to make international comparisons, mainly because of the absence of a universal classification system for procedures. Furthermore, diagnostic classification systems to group patients vary also by country. These obstacles to compare hospital and physician practices have profound roots in cultural differences and in political sensitivity for organising health care delivery between countries. The development of an appropriate Case Mix grouper tool including uniform diagnoses and procedures codes, leading to international use becomes a public health priority.
诊断相关分组(DRGs)是首个将患者按照具有临床意义且资源消耗同质的类别进行分组的健康管理工具。它们属于病例组合测量方法,于20世纪70年代在美国推出,用于识别患者群体中的临床差异,并通过相互比较相似群体来记录医院和医生诊疗行为的差异。它们还用于调整支付费率和提高医疗质量。这一创新概念首先从美国传播到几个西欧国家和澳大利亚,随后很快传播到东欧和亚洲。大多数国家的主要目标是基于相似患者群体,通过应用全球预算来为医院融资新方法。对25个国家的这一国际概述的主要结果是表明进行国际比较存在困难,主要原因是缺乏通用的手术分类系统。此外,用于对患者进行分组的诊断分类系统也因国家而异。这些比较医院和医生诊疗行为的障碍深深植根于文化差异以及各国在组织医疗服务提供方面的政治敏感性。开发一个包括统一诊断和手术编码、可供国际使用的合适病例组合分组工具成为一项公共卫生优先事项。