Department of Public Health Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Fakulti Perubatan, Cheras, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Ministry of Health Malaysia, Putrajaya, Malaysia.
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 25;14(8):e082547. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082547.
This study aims to address the significant knowledge gap in the literature on the implementation of Casemix system in total hospital information systems (THIS). The research focuses on validating a quantitative instrument to assess medical doctors' acceptance of the Casemix system in Ministry of Health (MOH) Malaysia facilities using THIS.
A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study was conducted, starting with a cross-sectional quantitative phase using a self-administered online questionnaire that adapted previous instruments to the current setting based on Human, Organisation, Technology-Fit and Technology Acceptance Model frameworks, followed by a qualitative phase using in-depth interviews. However, this article explicitly emphasises the quantitative phase.
The study was conducted in five MOH hospitals with THIS technology from five zones.
Prior to the quantitative field study, rigorous procedures including content, criterion and face validation, translation, pilot testing and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were undertaken, resulting in a refined questionnaire consisting of 41 items. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was then performed on data collected from 343 respondents selected via stratified random sampling to validate the measurement model.
The study found satisfactory Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin model levels, significant Bartlett's test of sphericity, satisfactory factor loadings (>0.6) and high internal reliability for each item. One item was eliminated during EFA, and organisational characteristics construct was refined into two components. The study confirms unidimensionality, construct validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity and composite reliability through CFA. After the instrument's validity, reliability and normality have been established, the questionnaire is validated and deemed operational.
By elucidating critical success factor and acceptance of Casemix, this research informs strategies for enhancing its implementation within the THIS environment. Moving forward, the validated instrument will serve as a valuable tool in future research endeavours aimed at evaluating the adoption of the Casemix system within THIS, addressing a notable gap in current literature.
本研究旨在填补医院信息系统(Hospital Information System,THIS)中 Casemix 系统实施文献中的重大知识空白。本研究使用 THIS 验证了一种评估马来西亚卫生部(Ministry of Health,MOH)医疗机构医生对 Casemix 系统接受度的定量工具。
本研究采用序贯解释性混合方法进行,首先进行横断面定量阶段,使用基于人、组织、技术适配和技术接受模型框架改编自先前工具的在线自我管理问卷,然后进行定性阶段,采用深度访谈。然而,本文明确强调了定量阶段。
本研究在五个拥有 THIS 技术的 MOH 医院进行,这些医院来自五个区域。
在进行定量实地研究之前,进行了严格的程序,包括内容、标准和表面验证、翻译、试点测试和探索性因素分析(Exploratory Factor Analysis,EFA),得出由 41 个项目组成的改良问卷。然后,对通过分层随机抽样选择的 343 名受访者收集的数据进行验证性因素分析(Confirmatory Factor Analysis,CFA),以验证测量模型。
研究发现,Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin 模型水平满意,Bartlett 球形检验显著,每个项目的因子负荷(>0.6)高且内部可靠性高。在 EFA 过程中,删除了一个项目,将组织特征构建细化为两个部分。通过 CFA,研究确认了维度性、构念效度、收敛效度、判别效度和综合可靠性。在确定了仪器的有效性、可靠性和正态性后,问卷被验证并投入使用。
通过阐明关键成功因素和 Casemix 的接受度,本研究为在 THIS 环境中增强其实施提供了策略。该验证后的工具将成为未来研究中评估 THIS 内 Casemix 系统采用情况的宝贵工具,填补了当前文献中的一个重要空白。