Glassmire David M, Bierley Rex A, Wisniewski Amy M, Greene Roger L, Kennedy Jan E, Date Elaine
Pacific Graduate School of Psychology, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003 Jun;25(4):465-81. doi: 10.1076/jcen.25.4.465.13875.
The current study evaluated the utility of the WMS-III Faces I subtest (Faces) for the assessment of malingering. Thirty nonlitigating traumatic brain injury patients and 30 control participants were administered Faces under standard administration and instructed malingering conditions. Although the two groups obtained similar scores when taking the test under standard instructions, both groups produced significantly lower performances when instructed to malinger, indicating that Faces is sensitive to malingering, but less sensitive to traumatic brain injury. The total raw score provided stronger classification accuracy than an empirically weighted combination of the five easiest items (i.e., floor effect items). A raw score cutoff of 31 yielded the maximum classification accuracy with 93.3% sensitivity and 80.0% specificity.
本研究评估了韦氏记忆量表第三版面孔I分测验(Faces)在伪装评估中的效用。对30名未进行诉讼的创伤性脑损伤患者和30名对照参与者在标准施测和指示伪装的条件下进行Faces测验。尽管两组在标准指导下进行测试时获得了相似的分数,但当被指示伪装时,两组的表现均显著降低,这表明Faces对伪装敏感,但对创伤性脑损伤不太敏感。原始总分比五个最简单项目(即地板效应项目)的经验加权组合提供了更强的分类准确性。原始分数截断值为31时产生了最大分类准确性,敏感性为93.3%,特异性为80.0%。