Haber Adele H, Fichtenberg Norman L
Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL 33601, USA.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Sep;20(3):524-32. doi: 10.1080/13854040590967595.
The purpose of the current study was to replicate the clinical validation study of the Test of Memory Malingering (Tombaugh, 19961997). Fifty cases were selected from two different participant pools: medically documented traumatic brain-injury patients and compensation-seeking, mild head trauma cases. Results replicated and expanded those found by Tombaugh and indicated that employing a Trial 2 cutting score of greater than 5 errors provided adequate sensitivity to suboptimal effort while demonstrating remarkable insensitivity to cognitively impaired traumatic brain-injury cases. Use of a lower cutting score (e.g., 2 to 5 errors) is also discussed.
本研究的目的是重复记忆伪装测验(Tombaugh,1996 - 1997)的临床验证研究。从两个不同的参与者群体中选取了50个案例:有医学记录的创伤性脑损伤患者和寻求赔偿的轻度头部创伤案例。结果重复并扩展了Tombaugh的研究发现,表明采用大于5个错误的第二次试验临界分数对次优努力具有足够的敏感性,同时对认知受损的创伤性脑损伤案例表现出显著的不敏感性。还讨论了使用较低临界分数(例如2至5个错误)的情况。