Piette John D, Schillinger Dean, Potter Michael B, Heisler Michele
Center for Practice Management and Outcomes Research, VA Ann Arbor Health Care System, Ann Arbor, Mich 48113-0170, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Aug;18(8):624-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.31968.x.
Patient-provider communication is essential for effective care of diabetes and other chronic illnesses. However, the relative impact of general versus disease-specific communication on self-management is poorly understood, as are the determinants of these 2 communication dimensions.
Cross-sectional survey.
Three VA heath care systems, 1 county health care system, and 1 university-based health care system.
Seven hundred fifty-two diabetes patients were enrolled. Fifty-two percent were nonwhite, 18% had less than a high-school education, and 8% were primarily Spanish-speaking.
Patients' assessments of providers' general and diabetes-specific communication were measured using validated scales. Self-reported foot care; and adherence to hypoglycemic medications, dietary recommendations, and exercise were measured using standard items. General and diabetes-specific communication reports were only moderately correlated (r =.35) and had differing predictors. In multivariate probit analyses, both dimensions of communication were independently associated with self-care in each of the 4 areas examined. Sociodemographically vulnerable patients (racial and language minorities and those with less education) reported communication that was as good or better than that reported by other patients. Patients receiving most of their diabetes care from their primary provider and patients with a longer primary care relationship reported better general communication. VA and county clinic patients reported better diabetes-specific communication than did university clinic patients.
General and diabetes-specific communication are related but unique facets of patient-provider interactions, and improving either one may improve self-management. Providers in these sites are communicating successfully with vulnerable patients. These findings reinforce the potential importance of continuity and differences among VA, county, and university health care systems as determinants of patient-provider communication.
医患沟通对于糖尿病及其他慢性病的有效治疗至关重要。然而,人们对一般沟通与疾病特定沟通对自我管理的相对影响了解甚少,对这两个沟通维度的决定因素也知之甚少。
横断面调查。
三个退伍军人医疗保健系统、一个县医疗保健系统和一个大学附属医院医疗保健系统。
招募了752名糖尿病患者。52%为非白人,18%的教育程度低于高中,8%主要说西班牙语。
使用经过验证的量表测量患者对医护人员一般沟通和糖尿病特定沟通的评估。使用标准项目测量自我报告的足部护理情况以及对降糖药物、饮食建议和运动的依从性。一般沟通报告和糖尿病特定沟通报告的相关性仅为中等程度(r = 0.35),且预测因素不同。在多变量概率分析中,这两个沟通维度在每个所研究的4个领域中均与自我护理独立相关。社会人口统计学上处于弱势的患者(种族和语言少数群体以及教育程度较低者)报告的沟通情况与其他患者一样好或更好。大部分糖尿病护理来自其初级医护人员的患者以及初级护理关系较长的患者报告的一般沟通情况更好。退伍军人医疗保健系统和县诊所的患者报告的糖尿病特定沟通情况比大学诊所的患者更好。
一般沟通和糖尿病特定沟通是医患互动中相关但独特的方面,改善其中任何一个方面都可能改善自我管理。这些机构的医护人员正在与弱势患者成功沟通。这些发现强化了连续性以及退伍军人医疗保健系统、县医疗保健系统和大学医疗保健系统之间差异作为医患沟通决定因素的潜在重要性。