von Konow L, Köndell P A, Nord C E, Heimdahl A
Department of Oral Surgery, Huddinge University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Sweden.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Dec;11(12):1129-35. doi: 10.1007/BF01961131.
The efficacy of clindamycin and phenoxymethylpenicillin in the treatment of orofacial infections was compared in a randomised study in 60 patients: 30 patients received clindamycin 150 mg every 6 h for seven days, and 30 received phenoxymethylpenicillin 1 g every 12 h for seven days. Where indicated incision and drainage were carried out. All patients but one in each group responded satisfactorily to treatment. Although the clindamycin group had a shorter duration of pain, swelling and fever and more favourable laboratory findings, the differences between the groups were not statistically significant. Of the 60 microbiological specimens 23 yielded only anaerobic bacteria, 34 both anaerobic and aerobic bacteria, two aerobic bacteria only and one no growth. In the penicillin group one case of severe diarrhoea occurred, and six patients in the clindamycin group had moderate to severe gastrointestinal discomfort, including one case of Clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea. This difference was however not statistically significant. The results support the continued use of penicillin for treatment of orofacial infections, with clindamycin serving as an effective alternative.
在一项针对60例患者的随机研究中,比较了克林霉素和苯氧甲基青霉素治疗口腔面部感染的疗效:30例患者每6小时接受150毫克克林霉素治疗,持续7天;30例患者每12小时接受1克苯氧甲基青霉素治疗,持续7天。必要时进行切开引流。每组除1例患者外,所有患者对治疗反应良好。虽然克林霉素组疼痛、肿胀和发热的持续时间较短,实验室检查结果更有利,但两组之间的差异无统计学意义。60份微生物标本中,23份仅培养出厌氧菌,34份培养出厌氧菌和好氧菌,2份仅培养出好氧菌,1份无生长。青霉素组发生1例严重腹泻,克林霉素组6例患者有中度至重度胃肠道不适,包括1例艰难梭菌相关性腹泻。然而,这种差异无统计学意义。结果支持继续使用青霉素治疗口腔面部感染,克林霉素可作为一种有效的替代药物。