Yaffee R A, Brodsky V J
New York University and SUNY Health Science Center at Brooklyn, USA.
J Gambl Stud. 1997 Winter;13(4):309-16; discussion 317-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1024915304140.
The purpose of this article is to respond to and expand on the ideas presented by Father McGowan in The Ethics of Gambling Research: An Agenda for Mature Analysis. We provide specific recommendations for future research and public policy in the field of gambling studies. We suggest that key conceptual definitions--such as, problem, compulsive, and pathological gambling--should be clarified, established, and distinguished from one another before gambling research is conducted. Proper methodological procedures are recommended, where power analyses, pilot studies, and representative samples are appropriately conducted and analyzed. Retrospective and Prospective studies are considered and differentiated while Discrete Time Event History Analysis--namely, Life Tables Analysis and Discrete Time Logistic Regression--are proposed.
本文旨在回应并扩展麦高恩神父在《赌博研究的伦理:成熟分析议程》中提出的观点。我们为赌博研究领域的未来研究和公共政策提供了具体建议。我们建议,在开展赌博研究之前,应明确、确立关键概念定义,如问题赌博、强迫性赌博和病态赌博,并对它们加以区分。建议采用适当的方法程序,进行并分析功效分析、预试验研究以及选取具有代表性的样本。我们考虑并区分了回顾性研究和前瞻性研究,同时提出了离散时间事件史分析,即生命表分析和离散时间逻辑回归。