Liu Kun-Shen, Liu Chao, Xia Yue, Li Yan-Hui, Du Wei, Wei Qing-Min, Zhao Wei-Jiang
The First Hospital of the Hebei Medical College, Shijiazhuang City, PR China.
Can J Cardiol. 2003 Aug;19(9):1005-8.
The infraclavicular subclavian route is commonly used for insertion of permanent pacing leads. However, the subclavian vein route may at times be a very difficult way to gain access to the heart.
To explore a new route to reliably and safely insert pacing leads.
The right supraclavicular subclavian vein route was selected to implant permanent leads in patients with critical illness or in situations where access through the infraclavicular approach was difficult. Access was achieved by Yoffa's venipuncture technique. A subcutaneous arc tunnel was made to pull the leads over the clavicle, which first arched close to the sternoclavicular joint and then curved to the inlet of the leads. The pacemaker was implanted in a right infraclavicular surgical pocket.
This technique was used in 44 patients. The venipuncture time of 4.4+/-1.2 min was faster with the supraclavicular route than with the infraclavicular route. However, there was slightly more blood loss with the supraclavicular route. Total duration of implantation was similar for both routes (supraclavicular route 72+/-16 min and infraclavicular route 75+/-20 min). Lead dislodgement, lead fracture and skin erosion did not occur.
Pacing through the right supraclavicular subclavian vein route is a safe and reliable alternative in cases where access through the infraclavicular route is difficult.
锁骨下途径常用于植入永久性起搏导线。然而,锁骨下静脉途径有时可能是一种非常难以进入心脏的方法。
探索一种可靠且安全地插入起搏导线的新途径。
选择右锁骨上锁骨下静脉途径,为危重症患者或经锁骨下途径难以进入的患者植入永久性导线。通过约法静脉穿刺技术实现进入。制作皮下弧形隧道以将导线拉过锁骨,导线首先靠近胸锁关节呈拱形,然后弯曲至导线入口处。起搏器植入右锁骨下手术囊袋中。
该技术应用于44例患者。锁骨上途径的静脉穿刺时间为4.4±1.2分钟,比锁骨下途径更快。然而,锁骨上途径的失血量略多。两种途径的总植入时间相似(锁骨上途径72±16分钟,锁骨下途径75±20分钟)。未发生导线移位、导线断裂和皮肤侵蚀。
在经锁骨下途径困难的情况下,经右锁骨上锁骨下静脉途径起搏是一种安全可靠的替代方法。